South China Sea: The sea where trade cannot afford a geopolitical accident
· 21 min read
This article is part of In conversation about sustainable finance & emission reduction systems, a new series by Diego Balverde. You're reading volume 14 of the Logbook of the BalGreen: Sailing the Seven Seas series. Here is volume 13
The BalGreen Net Zero Explorer left Cartagena carrying one lesson the Caribbean had permanently embedded in the crew: the most expensive moment to organise a response is after the problem has begun. To reach the next stage of the expedition we crossed Panama once more and re-entered the Pacific, but this time we were not searching for the immense oceanic scale of the previous Pacific chapter. Our destination was a far more compressed maritime space, one of the regions where trade, energy, international law, fisheries, insurance, submarine cables, manufacturing, defence and sovereignty coexist at a proximity capable of turning a navigational manoeuvre into a diplomatic event.
The South China Sea could not responsibly be written as a story of heroes and villains because the economic reality is too complex for slogans. China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan maintain interests or claims that overlap in different ways; commercial shipping requires continuity; ASEAN seeks to manage tensions through negotiation; the United States and other powers pursue their own strategic interests and freedom-of-navigation objectives; and millions of workers, fishermen, crews, manufacturers and consumers depend upon those differences never crossing the point at which political risk becomes economic interruption.
The tribunal constituted under UNCLOS in the case initiated by the Philippines issued a 2016 award that Manila regards as legally binding and that rejected key foundations for China's broad maritime claims; Beijing rejected the proceedings and continues to state officially that the award is null, void and non-binding. That legal divergence remains part of the operating environment that every shipowner, insurer and investor must recognise regardless of political preference.
Marco Silva explained it more simply during our first watch west of Luzon: "Here, a nautical chart never tells the whole story." The display contained depths, routes, traffic separation and weather; outside it existed patrols, claims, regulation, military infrastructure, fishing activity and government decisions capable of changing vessel behaviour without the wind moving by a single knot.
Jonas Müller inspected navigation lights, AIS, radar and communications redundancy with almost obsessive discipline. Ahmed El-Sayed established a larger-than-normal energy reserve because a political or meteorological diversion could require hundreds of additional miles. Helena Kovac prepared sampling focused on temperature, pollution, nutrients and coastal pressure; Sofía Rinaldi designed the visual record so the expedition would not irresponsibly film sensitive installations or activities; Lucas Andrade opened a DOIX.IO register called the Maritime Confidence Ledger.
Diego Balverde wrote the definition beneath it: "We are not going to measure who is right about a boundary. We are going to measure how much money the economy loses when nobody can predict with sufficient confidence what will happen in the next mile."
The approach toward Singapore immediately added a technical lesson. Traffic density rose until radar resembled a continuous choreography of container ships, tankers, bulk carriers, ferries and support vessels. At 01:46, one contact on the port side changed speed while another vessel appeared on our expected track. The assistance algorithm recommended a four-degree correction, but Marco saw that this solution would reduce CPA against a third vessel that was not yet an immediate threat. He rejected the recommendation, reduced speed and waited ninety seconds before altering.
The final manoeuvre cost six minutes. Sofía later asked why we had not followed the automated solution if it had been technically valid. Marco replied that the algorithm had solved for two ships while he was navigating among five. Lucas immediately translated the lesson into finance: a model can optimise terminal cost while damaging the energy system, reduce inventory while increasing vulnerability, accelerate a ship and create congestion at the next port. Local optimisation is not systemic efficiency. That sentence became our point of entry into Singapore.
Singapore appeared not merely as a city on the sea but as an economy built around converting location into trust. Vessels waited, moved, anchored and worked inside an ecosystem where fuel, repair, bunkering, finance, insurance, logistics, crews, data and maritime arbitration coexist around the same activity. In 2026 Lawrence Wong remains Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, while Ang Wee Keong serves as Chief Executive of the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore. The MPA continued advancing digitalisation, alternative fuels, skills and innovation during the year, while Singapore was again recognised as "Best Global Seaport" at the 2026 AFLAS Awards.
The expedition also connects with the Royal Singapore Yacht Club, a real institution within Singapore's sailing ecosystem, not as protocol decoration but as a reminder that long before digital twins, artificial intelligence and port platforms existed, maritime culture already understood preparation, weather and safety margin.
The MPA visit begins with Ang Wee Keong and technical specialists examining the Explorer's energy architecture. Ahmed explains that BalGreen never presents 720 kilograms of hydrogen as a promise of absolute autonomy. The reserve has value only because an energy-management system decides when to use wind, batteries or fuel cells and when to consume nothing.
Ang had spoken publicly during 2026 about maritime resilience and the opportunity to advance cleaner fuels amid growing uncertainty over global energy routes. Diego connects this logic with the port. Singapore already operates a hub at extraordinary levels of sophistication; BalGreen's opportunity is not to teach Singapore how to run a port, but to explore how part of that operating excellence can become regional financial infrastructure for confidence, capable of continuing to function when politics reduces predictability.
The interview with Justin Ong Guang-Xi, a CNA journalist who covered maritime issues in 2026 and interviewed MPA leadership on fuels and shipping-route security, takes the discussion directly to BalGreen's practical usefulness. The narrative question is unavoidable: if Singapore already has MPA, PSA, digital platforms, maritime finance and a global shipping community, what remains to be invented?
Diego replies that the new asset is not another application. It is a regional contract between data and capital. "Singapore knows when a ship arrives, how long it waits, what fuel it needs, where it can be repaired and which service it requires. But South China Sea commerce does not end in Singapore. The question is whether we can connect that discipline with Manila, Hong Kong, Port Klang, Cai Mep, Subic and other nodes without requiring them to surrender commercial secrets or political positions."
Justin then moves the discussion to digitalisation. In April 2026 Singapore presented OCEANS-X as a platform designed to connect maritime participants and facilitate direct data exchange among operators and shipping companies, within a broader programme of maritime research and development. Lucas makes clear that DOIX.IO should not compete against it. "Where a strong national platform exists, we do not build another one. We create financial interoperability."
A port can keep operational data inside its own jurisdiction while sharing only verifiable evidence: berth-window compliance, consumption per movement, equipment availability, emissions reduction, recovery time or completed maintenance. Investors do not need access to each vessel's manifest to know whether a contractual KPI has been met.
Within the narrative, the discussion with Lawrence Wong moves toward a larger question: what does economic neutrality mean when the strategic environment becomes polarised? Diego argues that Singapore can remain especially valuable because much of its historical advantage comes from being useful to many different parties. The Maritime Confidence Ledger would not resolve territorial disputes or replace UNCLOS, ASEAN or national governments. It would measure the economic cost of uncertainty.
Diversions, war-risk premiums, additional inventory, delays, contingency fuel, route duplication and immobilised capital can all be expressed as variables. When political tension adds ten basis points to insurance, forces three more days of stock or changes a route, somebody is paying. The architecture should make that cost visible.
Dinner associated with the Royal Singapore Yacht Club avoids formal speeches and begins with navigation through the strait. Marco explains why he rejected the automated recommendation in order to preserve distance from a third vessel. The discussion turns toward artificial intelligence and Diego establishes a principle: AI may recommend, but responsibility cannot be outsourced to the algorithm.
Ang and the technical specialists take the discussion toward vessel-traffic management; Lucas moves it into credit; Ahmed into energy systems; Helena asks who becomes responsible when logistics optimisation shifts environmental pressure onto another coast. Diego concludes that the maritime future cannot become a chain of algorithms optimising different interests without a common balance sheet.
After leaving Singapore, the Explorer headed northeast on a route deliberately designed not to turn the expedition into a political gesture. We had no scientific or economic reason to sail intentionally toward disputed features, and Diego established an absolute rule: no chapter justified placing the crew inside an artificial diplomatic confrontation. We would follow recognised commercial routes, keep AIS active unless legitimate safety requirements dictated otherwise and document economic phenomena from a professional distance. Marco welcomed the decision. "A research vessel does not demonstrate courage by interfering with coast guards," he said.
On the fourth day a problem appeared that belonged to no geopolitical agenda. The backup hydraulic generator began showing small but persistent speed oscillations. Ahmed compared voltage, temperature and current while Jonas inspected the system. Nothing was damaged. A layer of organic material and fine debris had partially altered flow around a secondary intake. Cleaning required thirty-eight minutes.
Helena preserved samples and noted that in heavily trafficked waters the boundary between pollution and operating cost is direct: waste, nets, hydrocarbons and nutrient loads are not only environmental indicators; they interfere with vessels, fishing, tourism, industrial intakes and maintenance. Lucas added the incident to the portfolio. An environmental improvement reducing cleaning frequency can become an economic cash flow when measured correctly.
Two days later, weather forced a larger decision. An organised convective area was advancing toward the planned route. Marco proposed a diversion of almost ninety miles. Ahmed estimated that the correction could add between 11 and 16 kilograms of hydrogen consumption if wind weakened. Diego approved immediately. The cost of diversion was visible; the risk of staying on track was not.
This asymmetry explains why so many organisations postpone prevention: money spent appears immediately, while the avoided loss never reaches an account precisely because it was avoided. Lucas created a future-bond metric called Avoided Disruption Value, usable only where historical models and sufficient evidence exist. Its purpose would not be to invent benefits, but to stop prudent decisions from automatically being labelled inefficient.
Manila receives us during a year in which the South China Sea remains central to Philippine foreign and maritime policy. In March 2026 the Philippines again publicly rejected China's broad claims across the sea, while Beijing continues rejecting the 2016 arbitral award. For the expedition, this controversy does not become theatre. It becomes an economic question: how does an archipelagic country finance ports, fisheries, supply chains and energy when part of the maritime environment on which it depends is subject to strategic tension?
The narrative port reception centres on Jay Daniel Santiago, General Manager of the Philippine Ports Authority, who continues in that role in 2026. The PPA had stated during the year that major Philippine gateways remained operational while monitoring disruption in global shipping routes, and in June it used alternative-port arrangements to preserve continuity after an earthquake in Mindanao, demonstrating that port redundancy is not a theoretical concept.
The stop also connects with the Manila Yacht Club, allowing the maritime discussion to extend beyond commercial infrastructure. Marco spends an afternoon discussing monsoon conditions, traffic, anchorages and the value of alternative routes with sailors. Maritime knowledge does not live only inside ministries.
The interview with Mikhail Flores, a Reuters journalist who continued reporting on Philippine maritime tensions during 2026, begins with the point Diego refuses to avoid. Can an economic project talk about efficiency without taking a position on sovereignty? Diego replies that it can and must distinguish functions. "A financial architect does not decide a boundary. But a financial architect cannot pretend boundaries do not affect price. If an insurer raises a premium, a company changes route, a fisherman loses access, a supply vessel requires greater protection or inventory must rise because disruption risk has increased, there is an economic consequence we can measure without settling the legal dispute."
Mikhail raises the 2016 award. Diego answers precisely: the Philippines considers it central to its legal position; China rejects it and maintains that it lacks validity. "My work here is not to rewrite either position. My work is to design a structure capable of functioning even if those positions do not converge tomorrow." The journalist asks how. Lucas presents an answer: regional contracts would remain inside undisputed jurisdictions and focus on services or transport metrics carrying no implication of sovereignty recognition. Port time, energy efficiency, maintenance, crew safety, documentation, weather response, cybersecurity and insurance can all be financed without asking an investor to take a position on a reef.
Jay Santiago moves the discussion toward the practical problem of an archipelago. The Philippines does not possess one port capable of solving all national logistics. It needs redundancy among nodes. PPA's June 2026 decision to use Malalag as a temporary alternative when an earthquake required structural assessment at General Santos offered a real example of this continuity philosophy.
Diego proposes scaling the logic nationally: every critical port should have at least one preclassified alternative, with documentation, capacity, depths, fuel, warehousing, inland access and protocols already digitised. If a typhoon, earthquake, geopolitical incident or technology failure suspends one port, the alternative should not first be discovered in an emergency meeting.
During dinner associated with Manila's sailing community, the conversation turns toward Filipino seafarers. Diego argues that the Philippines' maritime advantage is not limited to coastlines and ports; the country contributes an enormous human base to world shipping. The safety of those people must enter economic architecture. Ahmed proposes redundant communications, new-fuel training and incident protocols; Sofía insists on psychological support after violent events; Lucas adds that companies with stronger training and safety systems should be able to demonstrate lower risk to insurers. The discussion ends with an entry in Diego's logbook: "There is no resilient supply chain if the crew is treated as a replaceable cost."
Departure from Manila was the chapter's most delicate stage from an editorial and operational perspective. There were places where any image could acquire political meaning, and Sofía established strict protocols. Helena continued working with physical parameters that recognise no claims: water, temperature, oxygen, nutrients and particles. That scientific indifference produced an uncomfortable irony. Ecosystems connect what political maps separate.
During a night watch, a general VHF call related to nearby commercial traffic was received. It was not directed at the Explorer, but Marco ordered full attention. We reduced speed and increased margin. Fifteen minutes later the situation became clear and we recovered course. Diego observed that this minor interruption showed why communication itself is safety infrastructure. Lucas replied that it also has financial value. If common protocols reduce uncertainty, they can reduce claims, delay and premiums. Maritime confidence is not an emotion. It can become lower cost.
The final leg toward Hong Kong brought favourable wind and some of the lowest energy consumption of the chapter. Ahmed recorded less than ten kilograms of hydrogen during the best day. Jonas joked that the wind was finally subsidising the expedition. Lucas corrected him: "It is not a subsidy. It is an asset that does not appear on our balance sheet." Helena replied that treating nature as free until it stops functioning was precisely one of the habits the ocean economy needed to change.
Entering Hong Kong after Manila offered another contrast. The port was for decades one of the defining symbols of Asian trade, but competition from mainland terminals and other regional hubs has changed its position. Hong Kong handled 12.99 million TEU in 2025, 5.1% lower than the year before, and 3.14 million TEU in the first quarter of 2026, down 7% year on year. These figures do not mean Hong Kong has ceased to matter. They mean its maritime future cannot depend only on winning a throughput contest against Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo or Singapore.
The narrative reception brings together Chief Executive John Lee and Secretary for Transport and Logistics Mable Chan, both holding those positions in 2026. The nautical dimension belongs to the Royal Hong Kong Yacht Club, which remains active in sailing, rowing and training and in 2026 organised offshore racing including the Rolex China Sea Race between Hong Kong and Subic Bay. The race itself almost perfectly summarises the chapter: sport, weather and maritime tradition crossing one of the world's most closely watched strategic spaces.
The interview with Kevin Li, a South China Morning Post senior reporter specialising in Hong Kong economics from 2026, focuses on the question port statistics make unavoidable. "If Hong Kong is moving fewer containers, why should it invest in a new maritime architecture?" Diego replies that this is precisely why volume cannot remain the only metric. "A container simply passing through a port leaves a limited amount of value. Around that container, however, sit finance, insurance, arbitration, software, maintenance, certification, carbon, compliance, cybersecurity, traceability and data. Hong Kong can lose part of the physical movement and capture a larger share of the intellectual and financial value."
Kevin asks whether this amounts to accepting port decline. Diego says no. It means no longer treating every TEU as economically identical. A port can compete for pure transshipment, but also for high-value cargo, maritime services, new-fuel bunkering, insurance, dispute resolution and fleet finance. The South China Morning Post itself argued in 2026 that Hong Kong needed to strengthen maritime service capability amid geopolitical uncertainty and regional competition. Lucas proposes Hong Kong as one financial node in the future facility because it possesses an ecosystem able to analyse Asian maritime risk without needing to own every physical asset being financed.
Mable Chan moves the conversation toward mobility and data. Her bureau continues promoting transport digitalisation, information sharing and infrastructure planning in 2026. Diego argues that Hong Kong's port strategy should evolve toward a high-value maritime services balance sheet: not only counting containers, but measuring insurance, finance, arbitration, repair, data and technical-service revenue associated with each tonne entering the economy. Lucas adds that this allows innovation to be financed without requiring infinite throughput growth.
Dinner at the Royal Hong Kong Yacht Club becomes perhaps the most philosophical of the chapter. The conversation begins with the China Sea Race, wind, currents and distance to Subic, but inevitably ends in geopolitics. Diego refuses to turn the evening into simulated diplomacy. "This vessel is not going to solve the South China Sea," he says. "Anyone claiming to possess a financial formula for sovereignty is selling fiction."
What BalGreen can do is reduce the economic cost of living with uncertainty. Lucas talks about insurance and reserves; Ahmed about fuel and redundancy; Helena about shared ecosystems; Marco about navigation protocols; Sofía about responsible information.
Within the narrative, John Lee raises a positioning question: if every major Asian port invests in automation and new fuels, what differentiates Hong Kong? Diego replies: "The ability to finance trust." A marine insurance contract, an arbitration process, a technical certification or a data platform share one characteristic: they have value because two parties that do not fully trust one another accept an intermediary institution. Hong Kong's maritime future could build more aggressively around that function.
The chapter's result is the South China Sea Maritime Confidence Facility, deliberately designed not to depend on resolution of territorial disputes. Initial nodes would include Singapore, Port Klang, Tanjung Pelepas, Cai Mep, Manila, Subic, Hong Kong, Yantian and Kaohsiung, connected by an information layer that need not store full commercial datasets but instead shares interoperable contractual evidence. No participant must recognise another party's territorial claim in order to participate. Financed assets remain within clear jurisdictions, while cross-border metrics focus on commercial navigation, efficiency, safety, continuity, emissions, insurance and interruption response.
The first audit hypothesis identifies up to €212 million per year of recoverable value. Approximately €58 million could arise from arrival synchronisation, lower waiting time and reduced commercial diversions; €39 million from port energy, BESS, demand management and transition fuels; €31 million from predictive maintenance and asset availability; €28 million from reducing safety inventory through higher logistics predictability; €21 million through insurance, risk management and lower exposure to interruption; €18 million through digital documentation, interoperability and cybersecurity; and €17 million from reducing empty movements, improving transshipment and coordinating contingency capacity.
None of these figures represents guaranteed savings. The first twelve months would exist precisely to remove from the model everything that cannot be proved.
The environmental layer seeks certification of up to 310,000 tonnes of CO₂ equivalent avoided annually through lower waiting, more efficient routing, electrification, storage and lower auxiliary consumption. At €25 per tonne as a conservative assumption, potential additional value would reach €7.75 million annually, but the product would not be built around carbon.
The proposed instrument is the Maritime Confidence Bond, with an initial target placement of €1.25 billion and potential expansion to €2.5 billion after two certified operating periods. The structure would contain national sub-portfolios so that a legal dispute cannot automatically contaminate unrelated assets. A political incident in one corridor may affect premium and coverage, but should not automatically alter port contracts in another jurisdiction.
BalGreen Ports would lead efficiency and continuity audits. DOIX.IO would operate the evidence layer, baselines, MRV and contractual events. BalGreen Capital would structure national vehicles and their institutional aggregation. ClimateTrade would participate only on certified reductions.
Société Générale represents the type of banking counterparty capable of analysing international maritime markets; Ashmore Group provides a relevant emerging-market and debt profile; CPP Investments represents long-horizon institutional capital. Asian multilateral banks and export-credit agencies could be relevant depending on each asset, but no institution should be described as committed before a mandate exists.
BalGreen's commercial model establishes 5.25% of net value actually managed and verified, plus a 2.5% structuring fee on capital genuinely closed. If the portfolio achieved €219.75 million annually combining efficiencies and certified climate value, theoretical recurring remuneration would be approximately €11.54 million per year. An executed first issuance of €1.25 billion would generate €31.25 million in structuring revenue; a completed expansion to €2.5 billion would take the theoretical cumulative figure to €62.5 million. As throughout the previous chapters, none of these figures represents promised income. Mandate, data, baseline, implementation, audit, contracts and closing all come first.
The new element is the Confidence Reserve. A share of cash flow would accumulate to cover deviations caused by congestion, navigation incidents, temporary closures, cyberattacks or logistics disruptions that do not reach catastrophe level. The reserve does not finance sovereignty disputes or military operations. It protects commercial continuity. Premiums would adjust according to operating evidence: routes with stronger protocols, data, redundancy and safety should require less contingent capital over time.
Singapore demonstrates what happens when a nation converts predictability into economic value. Manila shows the opposite challenge: an archipelago must preserve continuity while operating in a maritime environment where security, law and logistics can no longer be separated. Hong Kong demonstrates that mature port competition forces an economy to move up the value chain from physical volume toward finance, insurance, data and services. None of the three needs the same strategy. All three need confidence.
The expedition does not offer false legal equivalence. International decisions, national positions and maritime claims do not possess identical legal status. The 2016 arbitral award exists and forms part of the legal framework invoked by the Philippines; China rejects it. BalGreen cannot change this. What it can do is prevent a bond, port audit or energy contract from depending on the fiction that disagreement has disappeared.
The strongest financial architecture is one that understands where finance must stop. We do not tokenise sovereignty. We do not assign a price to territorial claims. We do not promise that private capital will resolve geopolitics. We measure fuel, time, inventory, premiums, availability, maintenance, energy and emissions. That is where professional financial work begins.
On the final night in Hong Kong, Diego returned to the Explorer while Victoria Harbour remained alive with ferries, tugboats, cargo ships and lights. He opened the logbook and wrote that the South China Sea had been the chapter in which knowing what not to do mattered most.
Do not sail toward a dispute simply to obtain a photograph. Do not use a commercial map as a legal argument. Do not confuse operational efficiency with moral neutrality. Do not confuse an algorithmic recommendation with responsibility. Do not claim a financial structure can resolve matters belonging to governments and international law.
The crew had learned something different. Marco confirmed that six additional minutes can be the best decision inside dense traffic. Ahmed preserved energy for diversions that never became emergencies. Jonas found contamination before an intake lost function. Helena continued measuring an ecosystem indifferent to political lines. Sofía learned that responsible documentation sometimes means deciding which image does not need to be obtained. Lucas discovered that geopolitical risk can be expressed through inventory, premium, fuel and capital without turning it into spectacle.
If the nine nodes recover a verifiable share of €212 million per year, convert that improvement into an initial €1.25 billion placement, reduce up to 310,000 tonnes of CO₂ equivalent, maintain reserves capable of absorbing disruption and demonstrate that ports belonging to different jurisdictions can share standards without sharing sovereignty, we will have created something more useful than another blue bond. We will have built economic infrastructure whose value increases precisely because no participant is required to agree on everything.
The BalGreen Net Zero Explorer leaves Hong Kong for the final chapter of the series with one last entry from Diego: "Maritime peace cannot be purchased. But the cost of losing it can be measured. And once an economy understands that cost before the incident, it begins to acquire much stronger incentives never to reach it."
illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the opinions of leading Sustainability Thought Leaders, their views do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.
The world needs sustainability knowledge. At illuminem, no interest group or shareholder can influence our work. Thank you for supporting our mission to make high-quality and independent sustainability information free for all. Every contribution helps. Thank you for donating today.
Diego Balverde
Maritime · Insurance
Diego Balverde
Maritime · Energy Transition
Diego Balverde
Maritime · Power Grid
Financial Times
Maritime · Oil & Gas
Financial Times
Oil & Gas · Energy
Financial Times
Maritime · Public Governance