The tectonic shift: Sovereignty, sustainability, and the developmental promise of the Sahel States (Part 2 of 2)

This article is the second part of a two-piece series. Here, you can find Part 1

V. Innovative financing for a new era of infrastructure development

A. The requirement for new capital paradigms

Inadequate infrastructure is a fundamental barrier for the landlocked AES states, costing the continent up to 2% of GDP annually. The growing need for infrastructure clearly cannot be met by traditional government funding, especially when climate resilience is taken into account. In order to achieve a multiplier impact that is far greater than the present average of 1:3, the AES must adopt a new paradigm that uses public funding to catalyse private and institutional capital.

The institutional framework for this change was established by the CBID, but its success depends on its capacity to create project pipelines that are ready for investment and are backed by creative financing arrangements. In addition, the AES needs to access domestic resources, particularly national pension funds, rather than relying solely on outside sources. A crucial step towards true financial sovereignty is directing these long-term resources towards infrastructure, however difficult, provided that projects show consistent long-term revenue streams (as was accomplished with hydropower in Bhutan).

B. Innovative capital mobilization: Lessons from ASEAN

With an emphasis on combining public, private, and institutional resources to provide robust, sustainable infrastructure, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its partners (ASEAN+3) provide a useful arsenal of creative financing approaches that are highly applicable to the AES. 

The CBID is advised to utilise the cutting-edge finance methods listed below.

Table 3: Innovative financing mechanisms for Sahelian sustainable infrastructure (adapted from ASEAN+3)

Specific mechanism applications:

1. Blended finance and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Large initiatives like the Japan ASEAN Women Empowerment Fund are now easily financed by institutional investors because to ASEAN's successful expansion of PPPs and blended finance, which use risk-tolerant capital to absorb losses. This method works well for large-scale, capital-intensive renewable energy projects like the AES. The transition necessitates a fundamental shift in perspective from reliance on grants and charity to models that are commercially viable.

2. Green bonds and debt-for-climate swaps: Islamic Sukuk and green bonds provide market-based options for financing environmentally friendly infrastructure. The CBID should issue special Green Bonds to finance community projects that are climate resilient and water infrastructure in light of the Sahel's extreme vulnerability. Additionally, by transforming foreign debt commitments into specific local funding for environmental projects, systems like Debt-for-Climate/Nature Swaps can provide debt-stressed AES countries with relief, directly supporting programs like the GGW.

C. Governance as the ultimate de-risking tool

Governance is the key to the successful implementation of novel funding arrangements. To draw in and keep private investment, strategies like PPPs and Blended Finance need a high level of legal certainty, regulatory stability, and openness. International investment is aggressively discouraged by the existing military government and heightened geopolitical tension, which creates substantial political and regulatory risk.

The AES must quickly create open regulatory frameworks and dispute resolution procedures that satisfy international investment requirements in order for the CBID to fulfil its function. De-risking infrastructure projects is mostly accomplished through effective governance.

Modern, adaptable regulatory frameworks are also required due to the growth of decentralised, localised energy projects (mini-grids, off-grid solar). Approaches like Western Australia's Alternative Electrical Services (AES) framework, which offers "lighter-handed" regulation for new and unusual electrical business models (such as embedded networks and on-site power supply contracts), could be beneficial for the Sahel. For the private sector to invest widely in distributed renewable energy access, this kind of legislative flexibility is essential. 

VI. Current challenges: Geopolitical friction and internal fragility

A. The escalating security and humanitarian catastrophe

The most pressing issue facing the AES is the escalation of the same fear that motivated its creation. Security issues are getting dangerously worse. In the first half of 2024, reported deaths in the three member nations hit a record high of 7,620, a startling 190% rise from 2021. Large areas of territory are being lost as a result of terrorist organisations solidifying their power, particularly in the Malian provinces of Gao and Menaka.

The fundamental promise of the Liptako-Gourma Charter — collective defense — is not being fulfilled as a result of this failure to safeguard civilians. This threatens the moral authority and domestic legitimacy that the new governments rely on. If the security trend is not quickly and quantifiably reversed, the language of pan-African sovereignty runs the risk of being quickly delegitimised.

The security crisis is inextricably linked to an immense humanitarian catastrophe.

Table 2: The Humanitarian and Security Crisis in AES Countries (2024 Snapshot)

The region was home to 2.1 million refugees and 5.6 million internally displaced people as of late 2024. Only 49% of the $4.7 billion needed for the humanitarian response plan had been obtained, creating a crucial $2.4 billion funding shortfall.

B. Economic isolation and geopolitical realignment risks

The three landlocked governments face significant economic difficulties as a result of the ECOWAS exit, including disruptions to international trade, financial transactions, and human mobility. There is a chance that foreign direct investment will decline due to this perceived volatility. In a situation where addressing valid complaints is necessary, ECOWAS's over-reliance on penalties has proven detrimental.

The Sahel becomes a "battleground for international conflict" as a result of the AES's strategy of moving away from Western-backed security frameworks, especially towards Russian military and diplomatic help, while appeasing popular anti-Western sentiment. This realignment runs the risk of replacing one type of external dependency—aid and political influence — with another — military reliance and debt.

The growing cooperation between organised crime and insurgency is a serious destabilising force. As a significant nexus for international drug trafficking, the Sahel has cemented its status, increasing criminal influence and migration pressures. In order to maintain economic sovereignty, the state must have strong procedures to prevent money laundering and illegal financial flows in addition to control over the legitimate exploitation of resources like gold. Failure to do so puts the state at risk of institutional capture by strong criminal networks.

VII. Learning from the East: Models for state-building and integration

A. How ASEAN can help: A model for pragmatic integration

The AES should research and imitate the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which presents a convincing and useful alternative paradigm for regional integration. The AES opposes the politically motivated, European-style monetary unification that some ECOWAS founders implicitly envisioned. ASEAN offers a model for a "quasi-common economy" that purposefully avoids strong formal political or monetary ties in favour of significant physical connectedness and dispersed industrial chains.

Practical cooperation is the foundation of ASEAN's success, as seen by its $3.9 trillion combined GDP and prosperous trade agreements. The "light-touch" integration structure of ASEAN is strategically helpful for the AES, a body dealing with internal tensions and conflicting security priorities. Without the strong political oversight of ECOWAS, the AES demands economic cooperation (trade facilitation, corridors). Members can prioritise urgent, non-contentious shared interests while maintaining autonomy in other delicate areas because to this flexibility. For the landlocked AES states to establish dependable economic lines through neighbouring nations, including possible new partners like Togo, connection is crucial.

B. Emulation analysis: The state-led investment model of China

The People's Republic of China (PRC), especially its state-led investment model, is the nation that the AES is most likely to attempt to explain (emulate). The Alliance's ideological rejection of the Western liberal paradigm naturally leads to this mimicry.

1. Investment-led growth and state capacity: China's investment-led economic model, which is fuelled by strong domestic savings and government policy, is intrinsically tied to the country's fast transformation. A centralised, top-down developmental approach focused on rapid state capacity building — as seen in the imitation of China's model of centralised, bureaucratically administered government — is intrinsically more appealing than decentralised, conditionality-laden Western approaches, given the military regimes' need for strong internal control to combat insurgents and seize resource revenue.

2. Sovereign finance without conditions: China provides finance and technological cooperation without the political conditions that Western partners usually apply. The AES's objective of avoiding foreign, allegedly unfriendly organisations and quickly constructing the fundamental infrastructure required to connect landlocked economies is directly supported by this alignment.

Replicating this model, however, carries a significant financial risk. China's capacity to produce and capture extraordinarily high rates of domestic savings is essential to its success. The AES states are among the poorest in the world, with severe energy poverty and a great deal of humanitarian need. vast external borrowing, most likely from China itself, will be required if attempts are made to duplicate China's vast infrastructure investment without first mobilising and securing adequate domestic capital. This would fail to accomplish the declared objective of self-reliance by essentially replacing one type of external master (neo-colonial political dependence) with another (overwhelming sovereign debt dependence). Therefore, before starting large-scale infrastructure borrowing modelled after the Chinese model, the AES must prioritise aggressive fiscal reform and financial inclusion to mobilise local savings.

C. The Singapore model: Principled sovereignty and digital finance leadership

The AES should prioritise imitating Singapore because of its distinctive blend of non-alignment, pragmatic economic success, and principled country development, even as China presents an alluring model for state-led investment. The AES's pursuit of independence and sovereignty is strikingly similar to that of Singapore, a tiny, once resource-poor country.

1. The ideal template for nation-building: With iron-clad governance and meritocracy, Singapore transformed from a resource-poor, strategically vulnerable state into a global financial and logistical hub. This is the perfect model for the AES to follow as it develops. In contrast to Singapore, the AES has a huge youth bulge and enormous natural resource potential, including uranium, gold, and large solar and wind energy deposits. Optimising its sole resource — human capital — through long-term strategic planning, vigorous anti-corruption initiatives, and state-led investments in education was the foundation of Singapore's early success.

2. Harnessing resources and demographic potential: Singapore's model can be used by the AES to lessen the widespread "resource curse." In order to keep the resource wealth amassed through resource nationalism (such as gold) from being lost to corruption or illegal financial flows, Singapore's renowned high governance standards and transparency are essential. Additionally, the AES needs to follow Singapore's lead in considering its youthful population — the ultimate resource — as a growth engine rather than a security risk. The AES can turn its demographic dividend into the highly productive workforce required for industrialisation and sustainable development by emphasising large, ongoing investments in education, health, and skill development (as mentioned in Section IV.C).

3. ASEAN finance and digital implementation: Singapore is ideally positioned to act as an intellectual conduit for the cutting-edge financing concepts described in Section V because it is a prominent ASEAN member for finance. Singapore's dominant leadership in regional finance and digital implementation greatly contributes to the effective implementation of Blended Finance, Green Bonds, and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) throughout the ASEAN region. Since "digital economy enablement" is one of the "critical success factors" for innovative finance, this digital component is essential. In order to create the advanced, transparent digital platforms and contemporary regulatory frameworks required for the Confederal Bank for Investment and Development (CBID) to draw in large amounts of both domestic and foreign private capital, the AES must turn to Singapore's experience.

VIII. Next steps and policy roadmap

From intellectual agreement to institutional execution, the AES must proceed quickly. The short- to medium-term policy roadmap should concentrate on concrete actions that improve state capacity in crucial areas, mobilise private investments, and lessen geopolitical tension.

1. Prioritize territorial governance and local security investment: Efforts to stabilise security must be immediately funded by the CBID and newly acquired resource revenue. In order to successfully integrate development into the counter-insurgency strategy, this investment should go beyond military hardware to include the restoration of legitimate territorial governance and essential social services (health, education) in vulnerable areas.

2. Institutionalize innovative finance and transparency: With an emphasis on creating investment-grade projects for private finance, the AES must quickly construct the strong regulatory frameworks required for the CBID to function transparently and credibly. To attract climate-focused financing and reduce dependency on non-concessional loans for non-revenue-generating social initiatives, the use of blended finance and debt-for-climate swaps should be given priority.

3. Operationalise physical connectivity: The AES must give diplomatic efforts first priority in order to establish stable, long-term trade connections with coastal countries like Togo, given the economic risk posed by the landlocked double-bind. To lower the outrageous cost of intraregional trade, investments in vital physical infrastructure (road and rail corridors) should be made right away utilising domestic funds that have been mobilised.

4. Establish the AES-Singapore trade and technology commission (ASTTC): The AES should form a bilateral commission with Singapore in order to quickly normalise and diversify business ties outside of politically charged West African settings. This body would serve as the perfect, impartial conduit for:

• Normalising relations and trade: Avoiding political conflict with ECOWAS by luring non-Western investment and creating direct, reliable trade routes.

• Investment and finance transfer: Connecting the CBID to international private finance markets based in Singapore and facilitating the transfer of expertise in cutting-edge financing structures (such as Green Bonds and PPPs).

• Technology and governance transfer: Accelerating the adoption of transparent governance frameworks and digital economy enablement, which are essential for managing resource revenue and drawing large-scale investment.

IX. Conclusion and strategic outlook

A true act of "tectonic ambition" — a risky but essential experiment for post-colonial Africa — was the creation of the Alliance of Sahel States. The AES seeks to validate a security-first approach to regional integration 8 supported by resource nationalism and monetary autonomy, motivated by the failure of foreign, neo-colonial security and economic models.

The ability of the AES to turn this radical rhetoric of sovereignty into a stable, institutional reality is what makes it valuable for the rest of Africa. The benefits are significant: a workable paradigm for developing a self-sufficient state, the alleviation of the resource curse through responsible governance (following Singapore's lead), and the economic emancipation required to support a sizable youth population. Its accomplishment would show that decisive military and financial self-determination must take precedence over imposed paradigms in order to achieve true pan-Africanism in the twenty-first century.

But at the moment, the AES must strike a balance between enormous potential and serious existential concerns, such as the escalating security and humanitarian crisis and the danger of replacing one external master (French neo-colonialism) with another (debt dependence or military reliance).

The way forward is obvious: the AES needs to adopt Singapore's rigorous, practical governing ideas to its own enormous resources and population potential. The AES may be able to accomplish the sustainable transformation that has eluded the continent for generations by aggressively pursuing innovative financing and physical connectivity, as well as by using a strategic partner like Singapore to quickly de-risk investment and acquire the required technical capacity. However, the Alliance runs the risk of both economic collapse and the disintegration of the states it was established to protect if real security and robust institutions are not established. The entire world is observing, especially the continent of Africa.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

See how the companies in your sector perform on sustainability. On illuminem’s Data Hub™, access emissions data, ESG performance, and climate commitments for thousands of industrial players across the globe.