PFAS, leaded gasoline and the four-part screen that catches the next one

This is article 4 of 8 in The Third Number series. Here is article 3.

In 1930 a chemist named Thomas Midgley Jr. stood in front of the American Chemical Society and did something that would get a man escorted out of a building today.

The refrigeration industry had a problem he had been asked to solve. The working fluids in use, ammonia and sulfur dioxide, had already killed people in their own kitchens when a coil failed. Midgley’s lab produced an alternative, dichlorodifluoromethane, and to prove it was safe he inhaled a lungful of the gas and exhaled it slowly into a candle flame to snuff it out.

One motion. Non-toxic to breathe, and non-flammable. The room, by every account, was floored.

DuPont branded it Freon. It became the working fluid of the century’s refrigerators and air conditioners. Inert, odorless, cheap, and safe by every test anyone knew or thought to run.

It was inert in the room. However, it was not inert in the stratosphere.

Decades later, atmospheric chemists worked out what happens. Chlorofluorocarbons drift upward over years, get struck by ultraviolet light that never reaches the surface, and release chlorine atoms. Each of those atoms goes on to shred ozone molecules by the tens of thousands, acting as a catalyst that survives the reaction and moves on to the next. The hole over Antarctica that showed up on satellite images in the 1980s was Freon’s real Third Number ledger entry, filed sixty years after the candle trick, in a place nobody in that lecture hall could have imagined checking.

And this was Midgley’s second one.

The first one silenced an engine

In 1921, working for General Motors, he had solved a real and expensive problem. Engines knocked. Knocking wasted fuel and wrecked cylinders, and nobody had found an additive that fixed it cleanly.

Midgley found one. Tetraethyl lead, adding just a few grams per gallon, silenced the knock completely. GM and Standard Oil brought it to market under a name with the word lead stripped out entirely: Ethyl.

For fifty years it went into nearly every gallon of gasoline sold in the United States, and with every firing of every cylinder it went straight into the air of every city with traffic.

In 2022 a team writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences tried to put a number on what that exposure cost, as a Third Number might have, in cognitive terms.¹ They looked at children, whose developing brains took up lead at levels we would now treat as a public health emergency on one city block, let alone a continent. Their estimate: more than 800 million IQ points, cumulatively, across the American population.

Not eight hundred people. Eight hundred million points, spread across tens of millions of children, most of whom never knew their ceiling had been lowered before they were old enough to walk.

The historian J.R. McNeill, in Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World, put it as plainly as it has been put. Midgley, he wrote, “had more impact on the atmosphere than any other single organism in Earth’s history.”²

Not any other chemical. Any other organism.

One man outperformed volcanoes.

He was not a villain, and that is the problem

Everything in me wants this to be a story about a reckless man, because a reckless man is a solvable problem. You find him, you stop him, you write a rule.

Midgley was, by any measure his own century used, one of the great applied chemists America produced. He was handed a narrow question, a fair one, which was asked in good faith by people with real problems. Silence the knock. Make the icebox safe.

He operated on a rule that every engineer I have ever worked with operates on, and that I operated on myself for the first half of my career: answer the question you were asked, answer it completely, and prove the answer under test. Solve it, demonstrate it, ship it. There is no step after ship, because shipping to an operator is what finished means.

He answered both questions brilliantly, on the two numbers sitting on the table in front of him. What does this cost to build or acquire, and what does this cost to run?

Nobody in that room asked the third question. Not Midgley, not GM, not DuPont, not the society giving him an ovation. And the reason they did not ask it is not that they were careless. It is that the question did not have a name yet, let alone an instrument to measure and cost it.

What does this cost across generations, and who pays?

That is a description of how a careful, well-intentioned engineer builds a foreign organ and ships it by the billions of units, because the tool he had could only ever price two of the three numbers that mattered.

Why neither one announced itself

A body that destroys a mismatched organ does it loudly. Fever, inflammation, a full mobilization, and everyone in the room knows within days that the graft has failed. That violence is the mercy. It is fast, and you still have time to act.

Lead and Freon did the opposite, and that property is what made both of them so expensive.

As we have said before, both were simply admitted. A molecule with no precedent in four billion years of biochemistry trips no alarm, because no alarm was ever wired for it. So there is no fast rejection. There is no rejection at all, not at first. The thing sits in soil, rides groundwater, settles into bone and breast milk, and turns up in a blood sample taken from a place that has never had a factory. It keeps doing that for decades before anyone can agree what to call the cost and the illness it is causing.

Freon’s entry was filed sixty years after the candle trick. Lead’s was collected from children who were not born when the decision was made.

We are rarely undone by our failures. Failures are loud, they announce themselves, and we route around them. What undoes us is the thing that works.

The screen you can run in your head

The point of the third number is to have it before the concrete is poured, not eighty years after. And the first, cheapest version of it is not a spreadsheet. It is a screen you can run in a meeting, on the back of a napkin, before the engineering plan is final.

Four properties, and they are not new. Regulators already screen chemicals on persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity, and Europe has been adding mobility, on the reasoning that a substance which cannot travel is a much smaller problem than one which can.

So we are not proposing a new test. We are pointing out that these are not four separate hurdles a molecule clears one at a time. They are one question, the surgeon’s question, while wearing four coats. Can the living world recognize this and take it back in? Is this me, or not me?

Persistence is the master variable. PFAS, the class now found in the blood of nearly every person tested on Earth, is built on the carbon-fluorine bond, the strongest single bond in organic chemistry. That is not an accident of the synthesis. It is the entire point of the existence of the molecule. The bond is what keeps the stain repellent from wearing off the couch and the firefighting foam working in conditions that would break anything weaker. Persistence is the feature the customer is paying for and, in the same breath, it is also the opening entry in a liability that does not close.

Persistence alone is not the villain; that distinction matters. Glass persists. It will sit in a landfill for ten thousand years and do nothing to the water table. Gold persists longer and we put it in wedding rings, not warning labels.

Mobility. Does it travel once it is loose. PFAS has been measured in the blood of polar bears in the high Arctic, thousands of miles from the nearest manufacturing site, and in rainwater collected where there is no industry for a thousand miles in any direction. A molecule that persists and never moves is a local problem. One that persists and moves is everyone’s problem, on a timeline nobody voted for.

Bioaccumulation. Does it concentrate as it spreads. Mercury in open ocean water is often too dilute to detect with a simple assay. Parts per trillion, background noise. It arrives in a bluefin tuna a millionfold more concentrated, because mercury moves up the food chain and does not leave. DDT told the same story from another angle: sprayed on farmland, it thinned the eggshells of bald eagles a continent away, on nesting grounds that had never met a crop duster.

Toxicity, and notice it comes last, because every instinct in you wants it first. It matters more than the other three combined in the sense that it is the number on a hospital chart, and it still comes last, because toxicity only tells you the size of one billing. The other three decide how many bills go out, to how many people, across how many generations. A highly toxic substance that breaks down in a week and never leaves the drum is a bad afternoon for whoever mishandles it. A mildly toxic substance that persists, travels and concentrates is a bill mailed to your grandchildren, with interest, and they never got a vote on taking the loan for the goods.

But it’s natural

The screen does not care where a molecule was born, and this objection comes up every time because we like to point to a person or place of origin to blame.

Methylmercury also forms naturally, produced by bacteria in sediment, and it scores at or near the ceiling on all four properties. Minamata Bay, which gave the disease its name, showed how toxic it is, when industrial mercury waste turned into the compound that caused the birth defects. Asbestos is a mineral fiber mined out of the ground, and it sits in lung tissue for a lifetime. Aflatoxin is brewed by a mold on stored grain, no factory involved, and it is one of the most potent liver carcinogens known.

The axis here was never natural against man-made. It was always and is the compatible against the incompatible, and the four properties settle that, not a birth certificate.

Which space are you standing in

Run that screen on any foreign organ, and it turns out to be standing in one of two spaces.

In the first space, the hazardous property rides on a carrier we can swap out without losing the function anyone actually wanted. Lead was never what the engine needed. The engine needed higher octane to resist knocking, and lead was simply the delivery vehicle Midgley found first, cheapest, fastest to market. It took decades and a great deal of avoidable damage, but refiners learned to raise octane other ways, and unleaded fuel runs the same engines today without dosing a single child along the way. Chlorine was never what refrigeration needed either. Your freezer works exactly as well as it did in 1970.

This is the space with hope in it, and Midgley’s own two catastrophes proved the space exists. Both times, the function the market wanted survived, and the foreign organ smuggled in alongside it got retired.

In the second space there is no carrier to swap, because the hazardous property and the function being sold are the same physical fact. PFAS repels water and grease and never wears off the pan precisely because the carbon-fluorine bond does not break down. That is the same bond that puts it in a polar bear’s blood. The miracle and the liability are one property viewed from two angles. Asking a lab for the same performance but safer is not a hard engineering problem you throw budget at. It is a request for a different molecule that has a Third Number considered.

Most of the great mistakes of the last century were treated at launch as though they belonged in the first space, safe and swappable, when the physics and the BiosVerse had already filed them in the second.

Why this is not a history lesson

PFAS is not a metaphor for the data center industry. It is a material that sits in some immersion cooling systems right now, and its bill is no longer deferred.

Somebody is specifying a coolant this quarter for a facility that will run until 2060. They are doing it on two numbers, in good faith, exactly as Midgley did, and the screen above takes about ten minutes to run against the bill of materials in front of them. The rest of the challenge is costing it against the Third Number in nature’s ledger.

The foreign organ is the liability. The design the living world can take back is the emerging biomimetics industry. The number is how you tell them apart before the concrete is poured, rather than eighty years after, when the only people left to ask are the ones counting the generational cost in real time.

What we are asking for

The screen above takes about ten minutes to run against a real bill of materials, and it is the cheapest version of this whole argument. The BiosVerse-Compatibility Index (BCI) scores whether a design fits. The Generational Cost of Ownership (GCOO) model prices what the fit or the misfit costs across generations. Both exist and both run today. What is not settled is how they are governed: who holds the standard, what counts as evidence, and who has the standing to fail a project. That is the work of Biomimetics26, on November 9 and 10 at the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and it is open. Run it on one line item this week and bring us the place where it broke, because the places it breaks are what the standard has to be built around.

Next: why numerate, careful, well-intentioned people look straight at this and see nothing, and what changed about the clock.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the opinions of leading Sustainability Thought Leaders, their views do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

The world needs sustainability knowledge. At illuminem, no interest group or shareholder can influence our work. Thank you for supporting our mission to make high-quality and independent sustainability information free for all. Every contribution helps. Thank you for donating today.