background image

9. The Perfection paradox

author imageauthor image

By Renat Heuberger, Steve Zwick

· 2 min read


Return to The paradox of carbon credits
Move to 8. The Ambitions paradox <> Move to 10. The Claims paradox

Here’s a paradox so prominent it’s become a cliche: the perfect is the enemy of the good.

Few decisions we make are based on certainty. They’re all based on probabilities derived from incomplete information: Should I quit my job to pursue my entrepreneurial dream? Will the tropical storm become a hurricane and should I abandon my house? Will this medicine cure my disease or are the side-effects even worse? 

The bigger the stakes and uncertainties, the harder the questions—and the higher the risks.

Based on these risk-return probabilities, investors put billions of dollars into harmful businesses every day: forest logging, mining, or oil extraction. Nobody expects perfection. You get rewards if you are willing to take risks.

But paradoxically, when it comes to “doing good”, such as investments in climate mitigation, the principle of getting rewarded for taking risk does not seem to apply. Like in all other investments, carbon projects come with shortcomings and imperfections. Some work out well, others less so. And some fail. 

But often, failures are not viewed as learning opportunities but as evidence that the carbon credits system is fundamentally flawed. 

In short: Imperfections are fully accepted in projects that destroy the planet. But when in comes to carbon emission reduction projects, perfection appears to be expected.

This double standard makes carbon credit projects disproportionately vulnerable, and hence, paradoxically, a particularly risky investment. 

What is your experience in addressing the Perfection Paradox?

In this series, two leading authorities in carbon uncover the secrets and contradictions of an entire industry – in the most fun and engaging way. Through 24 curated Carbon Paradoxes, you'll learn everything essential about this field, starting with the tensions we must address to make environmental markets thrive.

This article is also published on carbonparadox.org. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the authors

Renat Heuberger is the co-founder and Senior Adviser of South Pole, a carbon finance consultancy. He has been engaged as a social entrepreneur in the fields of sustainability, climate change and renewable energies since 1999. Before founding South Pole, Heuberger co-founded and acted as the CEO of the myclimate foundation.

author photo

Steve Zwick is the co-founder of carbonparadox, a global platform addressing paradoxes in climate finance discourse, and the owner and host of Bionic Planet, a top-ranking podcast on economy and ecology

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)