background image

The Communities paradox

author imageauthor image

By Renat Heuberger, Steve Zwick

· 2 min read


In this series, illuminem and carbonparadox share 24 carbon paradoxes that demand our attention and discussion. Each one highlights a tension we must address to improve the way we value and protect our planet.

We focus on one of the most sensitive topics around carbon credits. 

Local and Indigenous communities play a crucial role as guardians of the landscape and the forests. They are the people on the front lines of the deforestation challenge and often the stewards of sustainable land management. Aligning with the priorities and following the guidance of local and Indigenous communities is essential for the success of every project that involves nature-based solutions.

But here’s the twist: “Local communities” are often far more complex than how outsiders perceive them. It begins with a fundamental question: who qualifies as a “local community” and who does not? Does it include a poor migrant worker who labours on the land? Or a wealthy landowner who has recently purchased a piece of forest?

Adding to the complexity, “local communities” seldom present a unified voice. They are frequently divided by internal tensions, disputes, and ethical dilemmas that outsiders may struggle to grasp. In some cases, cultural traditions – or simply economic interests – directly clash with conservation goals.

Land ownership is another layer of complexity—often unclear, contested, or disputed. Traditional land ownership systems often clash with government-imposed land registries, creating further friction and uncertainty.

This leads to a paradox: Involving the views of all stakeholders is a crucial component of any project that generates carbon credits. However, reaching a 100 per cent consensus and satisfaction across all stakeholders is usually impossible. Even in the best-planned project, you will inevitably find people who feel disadvantaged or whose views weren’t fully considered.

Requiring 100 per cent consensus, paradoxically, may well mean that the project won’t start at all. 

Have you experienced this paradox in your project? How did you address it?

Back to navigation

This article is also published on carbonparadox.org. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the authors

Renat Heuberger is the co-founder and Senior Adviser of South Pole, a carbon finance consultancy. He has been engaged as a social entrepreneur in the fields of sustainability, climate change and renewable energies since 1999. Before founding South Pole, Heuberger co-founded and acted as the CEO of the myclimate foundation.

author photo

Steve Zwick is the co-founder of carbonparadox, a global platform addressing paradoxes in climate finance discourse, and the owner and host of Bionic Planet, a top-ranking podcast on economy and ecology

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)