· 3 min read
illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on HEATMAP or enjoy below:
🗞️ Driving the news: A new report from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) sharply critiques Air Products' $7 billion blue hydrogen project in Louisiana, arguing it could yield little to no climate benefit despite generating up to $440 million annually in clean energy tax credits
• The report contends that optimistic assumptions about methane leakage and carbon capture efficiency make the facility a “lose-lose proposition” for both the environment and taxpayers
🔭 The context: Blue hydrogen—produced from natural gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS)—has been promoted as a low-emissions bridge to green hydrogen
• However, its climate impact has faced growing scrutiny, especially as U.S. tax incentives like the 45Q carbon sequestration credit expand under the Inflation Reduction Act
• The Louisiana plant, set to open in 2028, is one of several federally supported hydrogen hubs relying on blue hydrogen despite rising concerns about lifecycle emissions and accountability
🌍 Why it matters for the planet: The effectiveness of blue hydrogen projects in reducing emissions hinges on strict methane controls and high carbon capture rates
• The IEEFA report suggests that under realistic industrial conditions, the Louisiana facility could emit up to 7.5 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent annually—undermining its environmental credibility
• Without lifecycle emissions requirements, such projects risk locking in fossil fuel dependency under the guise of climate action and diverting resources from truly clean hydrogen technologies
⏭️ What's next: As Congress reassesses IRA tax credits, blue hydrogen subsidies like 45Q could face greater scrutiny
• Air Products (see sustainability performance) has stated it will not pursue the more stringent 45V clean hydrogen credit, tacitly acknowledging its emissions profile
• With Trump administration policies favoring natural gas-based hubs and loosening methane regulations, future oversight of hydrogen investments—and their alignment with climate goals—remains uncertain
• This moment may shape whether hydrogen policy prioritizes near-term convenience or long-term sustainability
💬 One quote: “There’s just not much of a benefit there, if any. It may be making things worse,” - Anika Juhn, co-author of the IEEFA report, referring to the climate impact of the project
📈 One stat: Air Products' facility aims to sequester 5 million metric tons of CO₂ annually—earning $6.3 billion in tax credits over 12 years—even though the project may generate net-positive emissions under realistic scenarios
See on illuminem's Data Hub™ the sustainability performance of Air Products and its peers: Linde Group and Air Liquide
Click for more news covering the latest on hydrogen
