The lies we've been fed: How marketing mythology became gospel

This article is the first part of a three-piece series.

It was the early 1980s. My first real job in industry. I'd successfully pursued a $2 billion national brewery to hire me for their internal audit program and left a town of 10,000 for the big city. In my mind, I had graduated.

Then I started auditing their product lines.

Product after product rolled through my analysis. Different labels. Different positioning. Different marketing campaigns. Some targeting college guys with party imagery, others going for the sophisticated beer snob, still others for the working-class hero. The advertising budgets were massive. The brand differentiation strategies were elaborate. The consumer research was exhaustive.

But when I looked at the actual formulations? They were all remarkably similar. Same basic ingredients. Same brewing processes. Minor variations that a consumer could never detect in a blind taste test.

The real product wasn't the beer. The product was the story we sold about the beer. And the stories? Those were engineered with far more precision than the liquid in the bottles.

That audit planted a question I couldn't shake: If marketing was the only real difference here, what else was marketing?

The century-long con

Over the last five years, through more than 150 podcast interviews with economists, scientists, and industry insiders, I discovered the beer industry wasn't unique. It was following a playbook that's been refined for over a century.

What I discovered was systematic deception about what we eat, drink, buy, and discard. These weren't accidents or well-meaning mistakes, as far as I could see. They were deliberate campaigns designed by the smartest minds in marketing, funded with billions of dollars, and aimed at reshaping our beliefs about health, responsibility, and truth itself.

What I know, sitting in boardrooms for three decades, is this: the lies were never bugs in the system. They were features. And we're still living with the consequences.

When marketing became truth

Let me show you what that playbook looks like. These aren't ancient history. These campaigns shaped how we live today.

The 'all-American breakfast' that never was

In the 1920s, Edward Bernays — Sigmund Freud's nephew and the father of modern public relations — had a problem. His client, Beech-Nut Packing Company, needed to sell more bacon.

Bernays didn't just advertise bacon. He manufactured medical consensus. He surveyed 5,000 physicians, asking if a "heavy breakfast" was healthier than a light one. When 4,500 agreed, Bernays took out advertisements in major newspapers proclaiming that doctors recommended a hearty breakfast AND what goes better with eggs than bacon?

The campaign worked. Beech-Nut's bacon sales soared. The "all-American breakfast" of bacon and eggs was born. Not from tradition or nutritional science, but from a PR campaign designed to move product.

A century later, we're still eating what Bernays sold us, despite decades of evidence linking high saturated fat intake to cardiovascular disease. The story became more powerful than the science.

The crying Indian who sold us responsibility for corporate waste

In 1953, the state of Vermont tried something radical. They banned single-use beer bottles. The beer and packaging industries immediately sued, asserting that it was unconstitutional.

They lost. So they tried a different strategy.

That October, Keep America Beautiful was born. It was founded by American Can Company, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, and later Coca-Cola and Dixie Cup. The very companies that create disposable packaging.

Their message was brilliant in its deception. Litter wasn't a production problem. It was a consumer problem. The issue wasn't that companies were manufacturing billions of disposable containers. The issue was that you, I, and WE, the consumers, were litterbugs.

The 1971 "Crying Indian" PSA became the most famous environmental ad in American history. A Native American man (actually Italian American actor Iron Eyes Cody) paddles through polluted waters, a tear rolling down his cheek as someone tosses trash at his feet. The message: "People start pollution. People can stop it."

The campaign was viewed an estimated 14 billion times. It successfully shifted blame from manufacturers to consumers and blocked bottle deposit legislation for decades. Today, Keep America Beautiful is still funded by Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Nestlé — some of the world's top plastic polluters — and still opposes meaningful waste reduction legislation.

We're still cleaning up litter on beaches while the companies that create it spend more on greenwashing than on actual solutions.

Got science? The dairy industry didn't

By 1993, milk consumption in America was declining. Despite decades of government-backed campaigns claiming "Milk Does a Body Good," people were drinking less. The dairy industry had a problem.

Their solution? Make milk cool, instead of claiming it's healthy. The California Milk Processor Board launched "Got Milk?" It was one of the most successful advertising campaigns in American history. Celebrities with milk mustaches. Deprivation marketing that made you fear running out. Cultural saturation made the tagline as recognizable as "Just Do It."

Here's what the campaign didn't tell you. In 1997, a Harvard study found that milk consumption did little for long-term bone health. Despite this, dairy checkoff programs — mandatory fees farmers paid that funded marketing they didn't control — poured $526 million into promoting dairy in 2016 alone.

The result? Got Milk became one of the most memorable campaigns in advertising history. But milk consumption continued its steady decline, dropping from 0.96 cups per day in 1970 to 0.49 cups by 2014.

The campaign was memorable. It just wasn't effective. But by then, the dairy industry had already gotten what it wanted. Decades more of government support and consumer goodwill, even as science suggested we'd been sold mythology.

When doctors prescribed cigarettes

"More Doctors Smoke Camels." "Just What the Doctor Ordered." Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, tobacco companies didn't just advertise cigarettes. They recruited doctors to endorse them.

They distributed free cigarettes to soldiers during World War II, creating millions of addicted customers. They sponsored major athletes like Joe DiMaggio and Babe Ruth. They bought and produced their own TV shows, flooding the airwaves with pro-smoking messages.

All while their own scientists knew cigarettes caused cancer and addiction. They manipulated nicotine levels to maximize addiction. They paid scientists to produce doubt about the health risks. They called legitimate science "junk science."

The deception reached its peak in 1994 when CEOs from every major tobacco company stood before Congress and, under oath, denied believing that smoking caused lung cancer or that nicotine was addictive. This despite countless studies, including their own internal research, proving otherwise.

Millions died while the industry lied. And here's what matters for every other industry facing inconvenient science. They pioneered the playbook. Manufacture doubt. Pay friendly scientists. Emphasize personal responsibility. Fight regulation. Introduce "safer" products that aren't actually safe.

The sugar industry's sweet deception

Big Tobacco's playbook didn't die with tobacco. It was adopted — sometimes literally — by the food industry.

In the 1970s, when the FDA threatened to review the safety of sugar, the Sugar Association launched a crisis communications campaign. They paid scientists to produce favourable research. They funded seemingly independent scientific articles that gave the appearance that industry claims were supported by evidence. They threatened WHO funding when that organization recommended limiting sugar intake.

Their strategy? Shift blame from sugar to fat. Emphasize that obesity was about personal responsibility and exercise, not about the products they sold. Characterize sugar as a victim. "Sugar tastes so good it's easy to believe it must be bad for you" was a strategy lifted directly from tobacco's "war on pleasure."

But the most audacious move? R.J. Reynolds — yes, the tobacco company — bought Hawaiian Punch in 1963. Philip Morris acquired General Foods and Kraft. They applied everything they'd learned about addicting people to cigarettes to marketing sugary beverages and processed foods to children.

Cartoon characters. Bright colors. Flavour manipulation. Game-like packaging. All the tactics that hooked kids on cigarettes, now deployed to sell sugar-sweetened beverages. Same companies. Same scientists. Same playbook.

Today, American youth consume an average of 143 calories per day in sugary beverages, linked to obesity, metabolic syndrome, and chronic disease. The Sugar Association's CEO still characterizes the 10% daily sugar limit as "ineffective at best, and possibly destructive at worst." Sound familiar?

The pattern you need to recognize

After three decades in C-suites and five years investigating these campaigns, here's the pattern I keep seeing: they all seem to follow the same script.

The playbook has six moves:

• Shift responsibility from corporations to individuals. You're not buying our disposable packaging — you're littering. You're not consuming our addictive products — you're lacking willpower.

• Pay scientists to produce favourable research. Fund studies. Create front groups. Manufacture the appearance of scientific debate where none exists.

• Question inconvenient science. Call it "junk science." Demand impossible standards of proof. Create doubt.

• Emphasize personal freedom and choice. Frame regulation as government overreach. Position critics as anti-pleasure, anti-freedom killjoys.

• Use government connections to influence policy. Threaten funding. Plant industry-friendly officials. Shape dietary guidelines and safety standards.

• Introduce "safer" products that aren't actually safer. Low-tar cigarettes. "Natural" processed foods. "Clean" diesel. Create the illusion of responsibility while maintaining harm.

This isn't a conspiracy theory. This is a documented strategy, visible in tobacco industry documents, sugar industry archives, and the operations of companies I worked for.

I've sat in the rooms where these decisions were made. I've watched marketing budgets dwarf R&D spending. I've seen campaigns designed to create the impression of action while avoiding actual change.

Whose interests are you serving?

That brewery audit taught me something I couldn't unlearn. When marketing is the product, somebody's interests are being served. AND they're probably not yours.

Every time you:

• Eat bacon and eggs for breakfast

• Pick up litter instead of demanding bottle deposits

• Buy milk for strong bones despite the science

• Accept "personal responsibility" as the solution to systemic harm

• Believe a product is safe because the industry says so

You might be living inside marketing campaigns that were designed decades ago by people like me, in rooms like the ones I sat in, serving interests that probably weren't yours.

But consumer deception is just the surface. The real machinery of deception operates at a deeper level. In the business decisions that shaped our current crisis. In boardrooms where I watched environmental costs become "moving targets," and exploitation become "market expansion."

That's what we'll explore in Part 2: the business side of the lie, where the harm gets systematically hidden and the profits systematically extracted. Because if you think the consumer-facing deception was sophisticated, wait until you see what happens when the boardroom doors close.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Sustainability needs facts, not just promises. illuminem’s Data Hub™ gives you transparent emissions data, corporate climate targets, and performance benchmarks for thousands of companies worldwide.