background image

The Control paradox

author imageauthor image

By Renat Heuberger, Steve Zwick

· 1 min read


In this series, illuminem and carbonparadox share 24 carbon paradoxes that demand our attention and discussion. Each one highlights a tension we must address to improve the way we value and protect our planet.

This is one of the shortest but most tricky paradoxes. 

Yes or no, should you fully control how the money is spent on the ground when you buy carbon credits from a project?

If your answer is “no,” you risk criticism for allowing potential misuse of funds due to lack of oversight. 

If your answer is “yes,” paradoxically, you face an utterly different critique: accusations of not trusting and empowering local authorities and communities. This can be perceived as paternalistic or even neo-colonial.

How to address the control paradox?

Back to navigation

This article is also published on carbonparadox.org. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the authors

Renat Heuberger is the co-founder and Senior Adviser of South Pole, a carbon finance consultancy. He has been engaged as a social entrepreneur in the fields of sustainability, climate change and renewable energies since 1999. Before founding South Pole, Heuberger co-founded and acted as the CEO of the myclimate foundation.

author photo

Steve Zwick is the co-founder of carbonparadox, a global platform addressing paradoxes in climate finance discourse, and the owner and host of Bionic Planet, a top-ranking podcast on economy and ecology

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)