Seven ways to see a system whole

This is article 3 of 4 in The Long Focus. Here is article 2.

The last piece in this series was about relaxing an over-focused organisation back into balance. This one is about what you actually see once you do. There's a body of work called regenerative design that gave me seven ways of looking at a system as a whole, rather than as a set of parts to fix one at a time. I'm going to walk through all seven, translated from their original language into terms a businessperson can use on a Monday morning.

Work with wholes, not pieces

We were trained to break problems into parts and solve each part separately. That approach built modern management, and it has real limits. Fix the sales process without looking at how it connects to product, culture, and customer experience, and you'll solve one problem while creating three more you didn't see coming.

Working with wholes means resisting the instinct to isolate a problem before you understand where it sits inside everything else. It's slower at the start. In my experience, it's faster by the end, because you stop solving the same problem twice under different names.

I've sat through restructurings built entirely around fixing one department at a time. Each fix looked complete on paper. Six months later, a new problem surfaced in the department next door, caused by the fix nobody had checked against the whole.

Find the essence, not just the function

Every organisation has a core reason for its existence, distinct from what it currently produces or sells. I'd call this essence, though most businesses would call it a mission statement and then ignore it the moment a target gets tight. The distinction matters. Function is what a company does. Essence is why doing it should matter to anyone.

When a company loses touch with its essence, it doesn't usually collapse. It drifts into producing whatever the market rewards, regardless of fit, until nobody inside the building can explain why the company exists beyond the fact that it currently makes money. I've watched this happen slowly enough that nobody in the room noticed.

Work with potential, not only problems

Most of management is problem solving. Something is broken, and someone gets paid to fix it. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's an incomplete diet. A company that only ever asks what's broken will never ask what's possible, and those are different questions with different answers.

Potential asks what a system could become if the constraints holding it back were addressed, not just patched. In my experience, businesses that spend all their energy patching problems rarely have any energy left to pursue what they could actually become.

Invest in development, not just output

If you don't grow the capacity of the people and the system doing the work, you can't sustain the results you're chasing, no matter how good this quarter's numbers look. Development means building people's ability to think and work at a higher level, not just extracting more output from the level they're already at.

This is the principle businesses skip first when budgets tighten, and it's the one I've come to believe should be cut last. Training gets treated as a cost centre. In my experience, it's closer to the maintenance a system needs to keep functioning at all.

Understand nestedness

Nothing in a business operates alone. A team sits inside a department, which sits inside a company, which sits inside an industry, which sits inside a broader economy and, eventually, inside a planet with physical limits. Understanding nestedness means recognising that a decision made at one level ripples through every level connected to it, whether you tracked the ripple or not.

I spent decades making decisions at the level of a single deal or a single company without fully reckoning with what those decisions did three or four levels out. That's not a confession of malice. It's a confession of how narrow the frame usually was, and how rarely anyone in the room was asked to widen it.

Look for the nodal points

In any system, a small number of points carry disproportionate influence over the whole. Traditional Chinese medicine refers to these as acupuncture points. Press the right spot, and the effect moves through the entire system, not just the point you touched. Business has an equivalent, though we rarely name it this precisely.

I've watched a single hiring decision, a single policy change, or a single relationship repair change the trajectory of an entire company. That's a nodal point. Most change efforts fail because they push hard on a spot with no real leverage and wonder why nothing shifts.

Attend to the field

This one is the hardest to translate, and I won't pretend otherwise. The idea is that a system carries a quality, a felt sense that everyone inside it picks up on, whether or not anyone can name it. Walk into two companies with identical financials, and you'll feel the difference within minutes. One feels alive. One feels like it's holding its breath.

I don't have a metric for this. Intuitively, I've always referred to it as the energy or buzz. I've felt it in every company I've ever walked into, and I suspect you too have felt that as well.

What these seven add up to

None of these seven ideas are individually complicated. Taken together, they ask something harder than any single change. Stop managing a business as a stack of separate problems and start seeing it as one living system that responds as a whole, whether you intended it to or not.

I don't think most companies need to overhaul their operations to start using this. I think they need to start asking a different first question. Not "what's broken here," but "what is this system, as a whole, trying to become, and what's actually in the way of it."

That's a much harder question to sit with than a problem list. It's also, in my experience, the one that leads somewhere worth going.

The final piece in this series takes these seven ideas and turns them toward a single question. What does the leader who can actually hold this way of working look like, and can any one person hold it alone?

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the opinions of leading Sustainability Thought Leaders, their views do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

The world needs sustainability knowledge. At illuminem, no interest group or shareholder can influence our work. Thank you for supporting our mission to make high-quality and independent sustainability information free for all. Every contribution helps. Thank you for donating today.