Rethinking power: From connection counts to high-tier reliability — De-risking ASEAN’s energy transition (Part 2 of 2)

This article is the second part of a two-piece series. Here, you can find Part 1

Introduction: The energy paradox and the mandate for resilience in ASEAN

A major obstacle to Southeast Asia's (ASEAN) economic development is an energy conundrum in which high grid connection rates coexist with consistently low tiers of dependable service. This is essentially a policy failure that stems from deceptive measurements that put political appearances ahead of proven economic performance, such as counting low-utility connections.

At the same time, the area is going through a significant energy transition, with Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) like solar expected to grow more than twelvefold by 2050. A thorough strategic revamp is necessary to manage the structural fragility of coal-heavy grids, integrate this fast growth, and guarantee high-tier energy availability.

This important developmental mandate is addressed in this opinion piece. It contends that a significant change is necessary to secure global competitiveness and de-risk ASEAN's energy future: converting a simple grid connection into verified, high-tier utility. In order to overcome this paradox and create a robust, integrated regional power system where flexible national grids, distributed energy solutions, and the ASEAN Power Grid (APG) are mutually reinforcing, the following sections outline the Integrated Strategy and Policy Roadmap.

V. Integrated strategy: Synergy of grids, off-grid systems, and the APG

An integrated approach that transcends the historical struggle between centralised grid extension and decentralised alternatives is necessary to address the problem of attaining universal, high-tier energy access and regional resilience. The ASEAN Power Grid (APG), national grids, and off-grid solutions must be seen as complementing layers of a single, robust regional energy architecture.

The mandate for flexible domestic grids

Strong, adaptable national grids are the cornerstone of a resilient regional energy system. With solar power expected to more than twelvefold rise by 2050, along with enormous growth in wind and battery storage, the region is going through a historic energy shift. Domestic grids must change into adaptable, future-ready systems that can react quickly to fluctuations in order to handle the rapid expansion of Variable Renewable Energy (VRE). In addition to managing the high grid emission factors now seen in coal-heavy regions like Indonesia's Java-Bali-Madura and Sumatra, stronger domestic systems are essential for effectively integrating solar and wind power. 

The modernisation process must take place concurrently with the development of cross-border integration and the strengthening of national systems. The VRE shift will lead to expensive curtailment, reliance on fossil fuel backups, or more outages if significant domestic investment is not made in real-time visibility, storage, and digitalisation.

Decentralised systems as strategic complements

Given the archipelagic geography of big AMS like Indonesia and the Philippines, where traditional grid extension to remote rural areas is extremely expensive and time-consuming, off-grid power and mini-grids constitute an important developmental tool. For localised economic activity in remote places to have access to dependable energy services, these decentralised solutions are crucial.

Importantly, decentralised solutions are intentional complements that improve overall system resilience rather than being a last choice for isolated locations. Off-grid solutions increase overall grid stability and reduce the risk of regional blackouts by easing the burden on national centralised systems, especially during peak demand. Additionally, localised power generation increases overall system efficiency by reducing transmission losses related to long-distance electricity transit.

Mini-grids can attain greater utilisation rates and strong financial viability by concentrating on anchor load customers (such as telecom sites, small industrial, or commercial firms) and encouraging Productive Use of Electricity (PUE) inside off-grid communities. This tactic speeds up local development by enabling underprivileged communities to "leapfrog" basic access tiers and reach Tier 3 or 4 service considerably more quickly than waiting for centralised grid extension.

The ASEAN Power Grid (APG) as a regional balancing tool

The epitome of regional energy cooperation is the ASEAN Power Grid (APG). In order to satisfy rapidly increasing demand, improve energy security, and facilitate the regional energy transition, the APG was established in 1999 with the goal of connecting all national power systems. The APG makes it possible for nations to exchange a variety of resources and integrate variable renewables (like solar and wind) more successfully than separate national systems by establishing a broader, integrated balancing region. By lessening reliance on imported fuels and susceptibility to fluctuating global fuel costs, this improves energy security.

Projects like the Lao PDR–Thailand–Malaysia–Singapore electricity Integration Project (LTMS-PIP), which demonstrates the viability of multilateral trade and the effective flow of surplus clean electricity, demonstrate progress towards the APG objective. Throughout the bloc, regional power trading increases system affordability, resilience, and dependability.

Integration is essential to achieving the full potential of the APG, not just between national grids but also between decentralised residential solutions and the centralised regional grid. To ensure that private investment in off-grid assets is safeguarded and that they are not seen as short-term fixes but rather as essential initial phases of the national system, regulatory certainty must be established. For mini-grids to eventually be connected to the centralised national grid, regulators must establish precise technical guidelines and commercial routes, along with specified compensation or buyout plans when grid extension reaches the region. By coordinating localised, decentralised access objectives with the APG's broad, centralised vision, this strategy lowers the risk of mini-grid investment for the private sector.

VI. Policy roadmap: Strategic recommendations

A change in the primary policy focus from political compliance (connection rates) to economic performance (reliability and utility) is necessary to transform ASEAN's energy infrastructure. In order to unleash the required investment and achieve a robust, integrated energy future, the following policy path is essential.

A. Institutionalising performance-based metrics and incentives

The fundamental fallacy of politicizing metrics must be dismantled by institutionalizing metrics that reflect developmental reality.

1. Mandate the MTF for official tracking and investment: For all official energy access tracking and reporting, as well as crucially, for the distribution of public funding and electrification subsidies, AMS must require the use of Multi-Tier Framework data. Instead of just counting low-utility connections, this guarantees that capital is allocated towards meeting high-tier access standards (Tier 5).

2. Implement performance-linked incentives for utilities: Systems that relate utility income and capital expenditure approvals to quantifiable performance gains must replace guaranteed cost-recovery models used by governments and regulators. This necessitates the implementation of performance-related reliability incentives linked to particular service quality indicators, such as decreases in the Value of Lost Load (VOLL) and well-known indices like the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) and System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI). In order to address persistent underinvestment in maintenance and modernisation, a necessary structural pressure is imposed by making utility financial health contingent on proven reliability improvements.

B. Unlocking APG and domestic investment through de-risking

In order to draw in significant private investment, it is necessary to reduce financial and regulatory risks in order to meet the enormous investment requirements of the APG ($764 billion needed for transmission and generation by 2045) and domestic grids.

1. Accelerate harmonized APG governance: In order to implement the APG, harmonised governance models (MoUs) must be ratified more quickly, and institutional roles must be clearly defined. In particular, the ASEAN Energy Regulatory Network (AERN) must be strengthened, and the Heads of ASEAN Power Utilities/Authorities (HAPUA) must ensure coordinated planning. Sustained communication and precise, well-coordinated implementation schedules are necessary to address issues like sovereignty concerns, regulatory disparities, and scarce resources.

2. Standardise and de-risk VRE contracts: The risk imbalance in long-term energy contracts (PPAs) needs to be addressed right away by regulatory organisations. By providing pay-as-produced PPAs with price stability mechanisms and guaranteed purchase commitments, for instance, standardisation should reduce market risks for VRE. The cost of financing for clean energy projects will be reduced by this legislative certainty, making them competitive with fossil fuel assets and enabling the required investment for the integration of renewable energy.

3. Mobilise blended finance for critical infrastructure: To mobilise blended finance and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), ASEAN must actively use specialised financing platforms like the ASEAN Power Grid Financing (APGF) Initiative, which was started by the World Bank and ADB. In order to integrate regional power commerce and increase national dependability, this focused strategy must address both capital-intensive cross-border assets and crucial domestic grid network enhancements.

C. Enabling Grid-Off-Grid synergy

Decentralised solutions must be carefully incorporated into national and regional energy planning in order to guarantee an inclusive and expedited energy transition.

1. Establish clear regulatory pathways for decentralisation: In order to give private mini-grid entrepreneurs regulatory stability, AMS must create thorough regional guidelines for off-grid rural electrification. The terms of operation, scaling, and eventual technical and commercial integration into the national grid infrastructure must be clearly defined in these rules.

2. Incentivise Productive Use of Energy (PUE): To encourage Productive Use of Electricity (PUE) in off-grid and recently electrified communities, policy must give priority to public financing and specific incentives (such as financing for high-efficiency appliances). By concentrating on anchor loads and PUE, new energy access points are guaranteed to become profitable assets with high utilisation rates right away, guaranteeing their long-term financial sustainability and optimising their developmental impact.

VII. Possible future scenarios: Pathways to 2045

How well policy can overcome the politicisation of metrics and mobilise the anticipated US$2,100 billion investment needed by 2030 — of which 46% is needed in the power sector — will determine the course of ASEAN's energy transition.22 Three different scenarios are presented by the road forward:

Scenario A: Full integration and high reliability (Tier 5)

In this extremely ambitious scenario, the APG's goal of completely integrated regional grid operations by 2045 will be achieved by complete political alignment and regulatory harmonisation. AMS overcomes financing obstacles by adopting performance-based metrics (MTF/VOLL) and effectively mobilising blended finance through the APGF. This makes it possible to successfully integrate the large rise in wind and storage by 2050 with the anticipated twelvefold increase in solar capacity. In this context, high-value, energy-intensive industries like advanced manufacturing and data centres are drawn to a guaranteed, dependable, clean electricity supply, securing ASEAN's position in the global economy and generating up to 650,000 jobs through smart-grid development.

Scenario B: Fragmented transition and reliability stagflation (Tier 2-3)

The risk imbalance against Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) and other regulatory uncertainties remain in this scenario. Investments in grid modernisation, which range from $4 billion to $10.7 billion, are not fully mobilised. Rapid VRE deployment thus increases system instability, necessitating expensive clean power curtailment or reliance on fossil fuel backups. The APG is still mostly a bilateral system that is making small but slow progress towards the durability and cost-saving advantages of multilateral commerce. Development stalls, and by 2040, the region's GDP losses from unreliability are expected to reach $2.3 billion annually.

Scenario C: Policy paralysis and investment freeze

An investment freeze results from a failure to address basic institutional and financial issues, such as the political preference for connection numbers over performance and the absence of unified regulatory authorities. State-owned utilities are still unable to finance necessary grid upgrades due to budgetary constraints. Due to unclear legislative integration pathways, mini-grids and off-grid alternatives continue to be underutilised and isolated. A large, connected population is condemned to low-tier energy access (Tier 2 or below) due to the system's structural fragility, vulnerability to high grid emission factors in coal-heavy areas, and inability to sustain high-value economic growth.

VIII. Strategic Imperatives and next steps

Immediate, high-impact strategic efforts that go beyond policy pronouncements to coordinated implementation are needed to guide ASEAN towards the high-reliability Scenario A.

1. Finalise and ratify APG governance MoUs: Finalising and ratifying the comprehensive APG Governance Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), which is anticipated to create comprehensive governance for the region's interconnected power system, is the top priority. Increased cooperation between technical and regulatory organisations, such as the Heads of ASEAN Power Utilities/Authorities (HAPUA), the ASEAN Energy Regulatory Network (AERN), and the ASEAN Power Grid Consultative Committee (APGCC), is also necessary.

2. Scale the APG financing initiative: In order to mobilise Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) and blended financing for both cross-border assets and critical domestic grid network upgrades, the ASEAN Power Grid Financing (APGF) Initiative must be quickly expanded. The current high cost of capital for infrastructure in the area must be addressed with this targeted financing.

3. Implement standardized VRE risk management: To link financial incentives with the energy transformation, regulators must require standardised long-term energy contracts (PPAs) that particularly de-risk Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) assets, such as pay-as-produced or guaranteed offtake PPAs.

4. Institutionalize Grid-Off-Grid integration policy: In order to integrate mini-grids into the national grid, AMS must create formal, regulatory systems that specify precise commercial and technical standards. In order to lower utilisation and policy risk for private developers and encourage the further expansion of decentralised power generation, it is necessary to establish defined compensation or buyout schemes.

5. Engage civil society in transition policy: In order to achieve open, egalitarian, and politically viable policy development for the energy transition, ongoing collaboration with civil society, NGOs, and academia is essential, given the sensitivity of subsidy removal and the implementation of new environmental taxes.
   

IX. Summative message

Transforming a simple grid connection into verifiable, high-tier utility is critical to ASEAN's economic future. The energy paradox—high access, low development—is essentially a policy failure caused by deceptive measurements that put political appearances ahead of actual results. ASEAN can create a robust, interconnected regional power system where flexible national grids and distributed energy solutions are mutually reinforcing by institutionalising the Multi-Tier Framework, measuring the massive economic cost of unreliability (VOLL), and decisively mobilising investment through tools like the APGF. The most important developmental mandate for the region is to move away from connection counts and towards performance-based, integrated infrastructure, which will provide strong economic security and future generations' competitiveness in the global market.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

See how the companies in your sector perform on sustainability. On illuminem’s Data Hub™, access emissions data, ESG performance, and climate commitments for thousands of industrial players across the globe.