Lease-to-own solar for MSEs in Kenya
Unsplash
Unsplash· 19 min read
Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) are the backbone of Kenya’s economy, accounting for 24% of GDP. Despite Kenya’s progress in expanding electricity access, many MSEs continue to face unreliable supply, high tariffs and dependence on costly diesel generators.
The program deploys roof-mounted solar systems, with optional battery storage, through a lease-to-own financing model. By removing the high upfront investment barrier, the program enables businesses to transition while building asset ownership over time. The program targets retail and service businesses with productive energy needs as well as agricultural and fisheries service centres.
Over a 7-year period, the program aims to:
• Enroll 3,000-5,000 MSEs
• Roll-out 15-40 Mwp of solar capacity
• Increase beneficiary business incomes
The program will be financed through a blended-finance structure, combining grants and private capital to ensure affordability, manage credit risk and crowd in commercial investment. Beyond energy reliability and access, the program will contribute to Kenya’s Vision 2030 by focusing on MSE development and inclusive economic growth, while demonstrating a financially sustainable and scalable model for productive-use solar deployment.
Kenya’s electricity system faces challenges of access gaps, reliability failures and rising demand. Despite progress, only 76% of Kenyans had electricity access in 2023 (World Bank, 2023).
Even for connected customers, service quality remains poor. EPRA’s 2025 national reliability indices show that consumers experienced on average per month:
• 9.42 hours of interruptions (System Average Interruption Duration Index; SAIDI)
• 3.57 outages (System Average Interruption Frequency Index; SAIFI)
• 2.57 hours of interruption per outrage (Customer Average Interruption Duration Index; CAIDI)
Electricity in Kenya remains costly with tariffs, ~$0.22/kWh, among the continent’s highest (World Bank, 2020; IEA, 2024). The total cost is further increased as households and firms are being forced into costly backup systems with diesel generators (EPRA, 2025).
Meanwhile, small commercial customers represent 17% of national consumption, up 11% from the year before, demonstrating the rising energy needs of the country’s productive economy (EPRA, 2025).
Kenya offers consistently high solar resource conditions, with national maps indicating 5-7 kWh/m²/day. Moreover, around 70% of the land is suitable for efficient solar generation and Kenya’s low photovoltaic seasonality score (1.38) supports predictable, year-round generation (Global Solar Atlas, 2019).
Despite favourable conditions, solar energy remains underutilized, contributing to only ~ 4% of total electricity generation with embedded and captive installations being modest at 300 MW (EPRA, 2025).
Kenya has seen notable progress in off-grid solar access for households, with around one in five rural households using standalone solar systems or mini-grids (IEA, 2024). Moreover, the commercial and industrial segment is being served by international private sector providers. However, the middle segment of MSEs remains largely untapped.
High upfront investment requirements have constrained the scale of solar market development, limiting adoption beyond larger customers. This has locked micro and small enterprises into high operating costs, driven by unreliable grid supply, continued reliance on diesel backup generation and high electricity tariffs (Uzziah et al., 2024).
Micro and Small Enterprises are a critical driver of Kenya’s economy with Micro Enterprises (fewer than 10 employees) alone contributing to 13% of the GDP and Small Enterprises (10–49 employees) contributing to 11% (Mulae, 2022).
|
Table 1: MSE distribution |
Formal |
Unformal |
Total |
|
# MSEs |
1,600,000 |
5,900,000 |
7,500,000 |
|
# MSEs operating from permanent commercial / residential building with special outlet |
70% |
8% |
|
|
1,120,000 |
472,000 |
1,592,000 |
Impact of the current energy situation on Micro and Small Enterprises:
• Lost opportunity: Power outages disrupt operations, reduce productivity, and cause lost sales. Firms lose an estimated ~5% of annual sales due to electricity outages (World Bank Enterprise Survey, 2018; NERC, 2019).
• Direct costs: Electricity in Kenya is already among the continent’s highest, and 65% of firms reportedly own or share a diesel generator to cope with outages, which further increases direct operating costs1(World Bank Enterprise Survey, 2018; NERC, 2019).
• Indirect costs: Disrupted temperature-sensitive processes lead to loss of value of perishable goods (Sollatek, 2023). In addition, voltage fluctuations are common in many parts of Kenya and contribute to premature damage of equipment (Nyawira, 2021).
The objective is to improve SME productivity and energy resilience, while strengthening the local solar market actors. These objectives can be summarized accordingly:
Table 2: Objectives
|
1. Clean Energy Access |
2. MSEs Productivity & Competitiveness |
3. Innovative Business Model for PV industry |
|
1.1 Increase adoption of distributed solar energy |
2.1 Lower electricity-related operating costs |
3.1 Introduce lease-to-own models tailored to MSEs |
|
1.2 Reduce reliance on diesel generators |
2.2 Enable use of productive electric equipment (e.g. refrigeration, machinery) |
3.2 Strengthen operational delivery and customer management |
|
1.3 Improve reliable energy for women- owned or led MSEs |
2.3 Improve business growth |
3.3 Use digital signals to flag underperforming or under-used systems for follow-up support |
The programme supports the deployment of lease-to-own solar solutions for MSEs in Kenya by addressing the key barrier to solar adoption: high upfront investment costs.
High level lease-to-own model:
• Businesses make a small upfront payment covering installation
• Monthly payments are made over 6 to 48 months
• Payments are collected via mobile money platforms (or regional collection points)
• Ownership of the system transfers to the customer at the end of the lease term
As most solar companies (hereafter “PV companies”) lack the working capital to extend credit directly to Micro and Small Enterprises, the programme channels a combination of grants, concessional and private capital to PV companies, enabling them to deploy lease-to-own systems without requiring full upfront payment from end users. The grant / concessional capital absorbs partly early-stage credit and market risk, enabling private lenders to participate and allowing affordable pricing.
The PV company retains ownership of the system during the lease period and is responsible for sales, distribution and installation. MSE customers enter into a lease-to-own agreement and make fixed monthly payments to the PV company.
Ownership of the solar system transfers to the MSE after the lease period, allowing MSEs to benefit fully from low operating costs for electricity after paying off the system. After ownership transfer, MSEs may continue to subscribe to optional maintenance and service agreements.
Illustration 1: Financial flows

1. Grid-connected micro and small enterprises (MSEs)
The primary beneficiaries are grid-connected Micro and Small Enterprises. The programme prioritises formal MSEs operating from permanent premises, enabling long-term solar investments (KNBS, 2016).
2. Local service networks and community-based agent
Community-Based Agents, installers, and maintenance providers benefit through skills development, employment, and long-term service contracts.
3. Domestic solar PV industry
Kenya’s domestic PV industry benefits from increased demand for productive-use systems, improved access to working capital and strengthened operational capabilities, supporting sector growth and professionalization.
Phase 1: Pilot Y0-Y1.5: The program will start with a pilot in 3 counties (Kiambu, Nakuru and Kisumu) representing diverse counties and MSE profiles, dense MSE allocation and stellar solar conditions.
Phase 2: Roll-out Y1.5-Y7: The programme will scale-up, conditioned on demonstrated performance.
Illustration 2: Pilot counties Table 3: Pilot counties' characteristics

Table 4: Scope phase 1 & 2
|
Segment |
Entities |
Monthly onboarding |
Avg. PV system size |
Total PV capacity |
|
On-grid MSEs Pilot |
150-250 |
10-17 / month |
4-6 kWp |
0.6-1.5 MWp |
|
Off-grid coop. Pilot |
5-10 |
0.5-1 / month |
30-60 kWp |
0.15-0.6 MWp |
|
On-grid MSEs Roll-out |
3,000-5,000 |
50-85 / month |
4-6 kWp |
12-30 MWp |
|
Off-grid coop. Roll-out |
50-100 |
1-2 / month |
30-60 kWp |
1.5-6.0 MWp |
|
Total |
~15-40 MWp |
Table 5: Clean energy access KPIs
|
Objective |
KPIs |
Data source |
|
1.1 Increase adoption of distributed solar energy |
# MSEs with active contract |
Customer registration data |
|
1.2 Reduce reliance on diesel generators |
% of MSEs reporting a reduction of diesel generator use |
Baseline onboarding, 6-month phone survey |
|
1.3 Improve reliable energy for women-owned or led MSEs |
# Women-owned or led MSEs with active contract |
Customer registration data |
Table 6: MSE productivity & competitiveness
|
Objective |
KPIs |
Data source |
|
2.1 Lower electricity-related operating costs |
% of total electricity consumption supplied by solar |
Baseline onboarding, Annual phone survey |
|
2.2 Enable use of productive electric equipment |
Increased electricity consumption (kWh) |
Baseline onboarding, Annual phone survey |
|
2.3 Improve business growth |
Change in monthly revenue band |
Baseline onboarding, Annual phone survey |
Table 7: Innovative business model for PV industry
|
Objective |
KPIs |
Data source |
|
3.1 Introduce lease-to-own models tailored to MSEs |
% of contracts operational after 6 months % of payment regularity |
Billing records |
|
3.2 Strengthen operational delivery and customer management |
Average time from customer interest to installation or rejection (days) |
Customer registration data, Service log |
|
3.3 Use digital signals to flag support |
% of installed systems showing regular load activity4 % of flagged systems receiving follow-up (visit or call) within X days |
Simple controller signal, Rule-based flag, Service log |
The programme aligns with Kenya Vision 2030 and the National Energy Compact 2025–2030, which prioritise private-sector-led delivery of clean, affordable energy to support productivity and competitiveness of the economic sectors (MEPD, 2025). Moverover, it directly supports SDG 7 and SDG 8, while contributing meaningfully to SDGs 5, 9 and 13 (UN, 2015).
SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
• Expands reliable and affordable energy.
• Improves energy reliability and quality.
• Accelerates distributed renewable energy.
SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
•Strengthens productivity of MSEs.
• Lowers operating costs while reduces downtime, lost sales, and operating risk. ● Enables enterprises to scale into higher-value, electricity-dependent activities.
In addition:
• SDG 5 - Gender Equality: Many MSEs and cooperatives are women-owned or women-led.
• SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure: Supports innovation in delivery models.
• SDG 13 - Climate Action: Reduces reliance on diesel generators.
The programme implementation follows a trust-based journey with physical presence, covering key areas such as rapid eligibility assessment and post-installation engagement.
Table 8: Implementation flow
|
Awareness Partnership & Trusted Community Actors |
→ |
Consideration Community-Based Agents (CBAs) |
→ |
Eligibility & Feasibility CBAs & PV Company & Technical Partners |
→ |
Installation & Onboarding Installation & Service Network (ISN) |
→ |
Monitoring, Service & Upsell PV Company, ISN & CBAs |
Awareness
|
Objective |
To raise awareness and build trust |
|
Barriers to adoption |
-Limited knowledge of productive-use solar solutions -Poor reputation from past solar projects -Low trust in financing models |
|
Modes |
Awareness activities will be conducted through locally embedded and trusted channels: -Partnership networks: including SACCO5s and mobile money providers, to introduce the program to their member base -Trusted local actors, such as electricians, technicians and equipment suppliers, who introduce the service during routine business interactions -Market and cluster engagement, with short group information sessions in areas where MSEs are concentrated - Peer visibility and referrals, make early installations act as demonstration sites |
|
Tools |
-Printed information -Verbal and peer testimonials |
Consideration
|
Objective |
To clearly communicate the benefits: affordability and simplicity |
|
Barriers to adoption |
-Perception that solar systems are too complex or too expensive -Fear of hidden costs |
|
Modes |
Community-Based Agents (CBAs) provide simple, consistent explanations of the offering, including key selling points: -No or minimal upfront payment -No traditional loans or collateral requirements -Ownership of the system at the end of the lease -Lower and more predictable operating electricity costs |
|
Tools |
-In-person discussions supported by printed materials -Mobile phone follow-up |
Eligibility and feasibility
|
Objective |
To rapidly determine technical and financial feasibility |
|
Barriers to adoption |
-Lengthy screening and verification processes -Drop-off between expressed interest and installation |
|
Modes |
CBAs collect initial information, while the solar provider conducts the assessment using a small set of standardized criterias focused on operational viability. Partner institutions support verification where relevant. |
|
Screening Elements |
-Business viability and electricity use -Premises stability -Payment capacity proxies |
|
Supporting Roles |
-Market associations or local authorities: Verify business legitimacy -Technology partners: Validate roof suitability and load profiles using photos and geolocation data |
|
Tools |
-In-person data collection -Phone-based confirmation of eligibility |
Installation and onboarding
|
Objective |
To deliver a fast and high-quality installation |
|
Barriers to adoption |
Insufficient user understanding leading to underuse or abandonment |
|
Modes |
Installation is conducted by trained and certified local technicians. Customer onboarding includes: -Hands-on user training -System limits and basic troubleshooting -Guidance on productive |
|
Tools |
-On-site demonstrations -Printed user guides with visual instructions |
Monitoring, service and upsell
|
Objective |
To ensure systems are actively used |
|
Barriers to adoption |
-Poor understanding of system -Lack of follow-up after installation |
|
Modes |
-Monitoring systems generate performance flags -CBAs conduct follow-up visits or calls based on flags or scheduled visits |
|
Tools |
-Automated system alerts -Phone calls and physical visits by CBAs -Simple surveys |
Risks & migitations
|
Risks |
Description of risk |
Mitigation measure |
|
Market & Demand risk |
Lower-than-expected uptake |
Community-based awareness, early demonstration sites and peer referrals |
|
Credit & Payment risk |
Risk of delayed or defaulted payments |
Screening, possibility to remotely turn off system (used as collateral) |
|
Operational & Implementation risk |
Delays or quality issues in installation and maintenance |
Training program and mobile-survey follow-up |
|
Technical Performance risk |
Systems underperformance |
Early focus on follow-up |
|
Financial Sustainability risk Dependence on grants / |
Concessional capital |
Pilot phase to validate portfolio performance |
illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.
Track the real‑world impact behind the sustainability headlines. illuminem’s Data Hub™ offers transparent performance data and climate targets of companies driving the transition.
EPRA. (2025). Energy & petroleum statistics report. The Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority. https://www.epra.go.ke/sites/default/files/2025-09/Statistics-Report-June-2025-Web.p df
Global Solar Atlas. (2019). Global Solar Atlas: Kenya. Global Solar Atlas. https://globalsolaratlas.info/global-pv-potential-study
Global Solar Council. (2024). Distributed Solar in Kenya. Empowering People with Distributed Solar. https://www.globalsolarcouncil.org/our-work/empowering-people-with-solar-pv/distri buted-solar-in-kenya/#
IEA. (2024). Kenya 2024 - Energy Policy Review. International Energy Agency. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/98bc7ce1-b22d-48c9-9ca2-b668ffbfcc4b/Ken ya2024.pdf
Kenya Law. (2024). Energy Act - Kenya Law. Kenya Law https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/act/2019/1/eng@2022-12-31
KNBS. (2016). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Survey. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. https://www.knbs.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2016-Micro-Small-and-Medium Enterprises-Basic-Report.pdf
MEPD. (2025, July 2). Kenya National Energy Compact 2025 – 2030. Ministry of Energy. https://energy.go.ke/sites/default/files/Kenya%20National%20Energy%20Compact% 20Draft%20%202.pdf
Mulae, E. (2022). The Micro and Small Medium Enterprises Development in Kenya. The Trade Law Centre NPC. https://www.tralac.org/blog/article/15863-the-micro-and-small-medium-enterprises-de velopment-in-kenya.html
NERC. (2019). Costs of unreliable electricity to African firms. Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. https://energyforgrowth.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Costs-of-unreliable-electricit y-to-African-firms-1-2.pdf
Nyawira, C. (2021). Reliable electrical power equals a stronger economy and better quality of life. Lendahand. https://www.lendahand.com/en-EU/blog/798-reliable-electrical-power-equals-a-strong er-economy-and-better-quality-of-life-here-s-what-sollatek-is-doing-about-it
ODI. (2014). Measuring the Economic Costs of Unreliable Power in Developing Countries. Overseas Development Institute (ODI). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a089e1ed915d622c000441/61270-El ectricity-Insecurity-Briefing-170914.pdf
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (GPT-based language model). Used for literature discovery and refining text. https://www.openai.com
Sollatek. (2023). Solar Power – USADF & IOWB. Sollatek. https://sollatek.co.ke/solar-power-usadf-iowb/
UN. (2015). THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Uzziah, M., Thondhlana, G., & Ruwanza, S. (2024). Adoption of residential rooftop solar PV systems in South Africa: A scoping review of barriers. Heliyon, 10(10).
World Bank. (2020). Doing Business in Kenya - World Bank Group. Doing Business. https://archive.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/kenya#DB_ge
World Bank. (2023). Doing Business in Kenya - World Bank Group. Doing Business. https://archive.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/kenya#DB_ge
World Bank Enterprise Survey. (2018). Economies - Formal Sector Enterprise Surveys - Kenya. World Bank Enterprise surveys. https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/2018/kenya
Thomas Vogel

Renewables · Corporate Sustainability
illuminem briefings

Renewables · Energy Management & Efficiency
illuminem briefings

Renewables · Energy
Financial Times

Solar · Renewables
Financial Times

AI · Sustainable Investment
Euronews

Renewables · Energy