background image

Lawmakers fear EU Parliament will struggle to find ‘middle ground’ on Omnibus

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Responsible Investor or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: Lawmakers in the European Parliament are voicing concern that mid-July’s start of Omnibus negotiations may not reach consensus, as divisions persist over the scope of simplification measures in the package
• The “stop-the-clock” directive delaying key sustainability rules has passed, but deeper cuts to CSRD, CSDDD and the EU Taxonomy remain contentious
• Member states — including Council backing to significantly reduce reporting obligations — are pushing ahead, prompting lawmakers to question whether compromise is attainable

🔭 The context: The Omnibus package, introduced by the European Commission in February 2025, seeks to simplify or delay definitions and thresholds across the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and EU Taxonomy
• A preliminary parliamentary debate earlier this year highlighted polarized views — from calls for deeper deregulation to advocates defending the integrity of sustainability frameworks
• Meanwhile, the recently adopted “stop-the-clock” directive pushes back implementation deadlines to allow time for negotiation

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: The Omnibus carries substantial sustainability implications: narrowing the scope of CSRD and CSDDD could exclude thousands of companies from reporting and due diligence obligations, diluting ecosystem transparency and accountability
• Critics warn that weakening reporting obligations without proportionality assessments may trigger legal challenges and undermine climate and human rights safeguards 

⏭️ What's next: Formal trilogue negotiations are set to begin mid‐July, as European Parliament and Council positions are hammered out; an MEP vote on Parliament’s position is expected in October 2025 
• Key unresolved issues include threshold levels (employees, turnover), the strength of due diligence provisions, and the formal timeline

💬 One quote: “We could see years of uncertainty… Businesses won’t know what rules apply, while courts and companies argue over who’s liable for what.” — David Frydlinger, Cirio partner

📈 One stat: The proposed changes would restrict CSRD reporting to companies with at least 1,000 employees and €450 million in turnover, removing coverage from firms between 250–1,000 employees — slashing the compliance scope by approximately 80%

Click for more news covering the latest on sustainable finance and public governance 

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)