From values to traits: the sociopathic nature of corporations (part 2)

In a previous exploration “The sociopathic nature of corporations: Power Dynamics and how to break free”, I delved into Jeremy Bentham’s design of the Panopticon—a prison structure intended to perfect the art of surveillance—and Michel Foucault’s subsequent theory explaining how such surveillance becomes internalized over time. This internalization, in essence, ensures that individuals police themselves without direct coercion. This process of self-surveillance has profound implications in modern corporate and social structures, where elite-controlled narratives and institutional norms reinforce a status quo beneficial to a select few. Under these conditions, people gradually adapt by curbing behaviors that might disrupt or challenge prevailing power dynamics. A system that thrives on constant oversight, and compliance is well-suited to cultivating the so-called “Dark Triad” of narcissism, sociopathy, and Machiavellianism—traits that confer advantages when profit maximization and power consolidation are the primary incentives.

My earlier response was to propose a “Light Triad,” drawing inspiration from the wisdom of many original people, Indigenous cultures and their core values of respect for all beings, recognition of our interconnectedness, and stewardship of shared resources. These values, I suggested, could serve as a powerful antidote to the corrosive influences of the Dark Triad. However, Nate Hagens pointed out a critical distinction: these were values rather than traits. That observation led me to reflect more deeply on how genuine transformation happens through sustained, observable behaviors. In other words, for a set of values to become truly impactful, they must be lived out so consistently that they become traits—recognizable, stable patterns of behavior that shape one’s identity and, by extension, the fabric of one’s community.

The Dark Triad and Its Systemic Roots

The Dark Triad—comprising narcissism, sociopathy, and Machiavellianism—proliferates in environments that reward competition and self-interest. A profit-driven society often deems manipulation (the hallmark of Machiavellianism) a necessary strategy for business success, while emotional detachment (the hallmark of sociopathy) can be advantageous in making ruthless decisions. Narcissism, similarly, is reinforced by hierarchical structures that encourage self-aggrandizement to climb the social or corporate ladder.

Through mechanisms of surveillance—be it in the workplace via constant performance monitoring or in social media through external validation—individuals find themselves preoccupied with how others perceive their actions. This preoccupation can nudge them toward displaying traits that secure the highest reward in these systems: the ability to strategize for personal gain, to remain unburdened by empathy, and to prioritize self-promotion. In such a context, empathy and communal responsibility often become vulnerabilities rather than strengths.

It becomes evident that these Dark Triad traits do not merely arise from personal moral failing; they are deeply woven into systemic incentives. The question, then, is how to introduce a different set of incentives that reward the behaviors we truly wish to see—those rooted in cooperation, mutual care, and ecological responsibility.

From Values to Action: The Essence of the Light Triad

Original peoples around the world often hold core values such as respect for all beings, recognition of profound interconnectedness, and careful stewardship of resources. Yet these values alone—no matter how lofty—remain too abstract unless they translate into concrete, day-to-day behaviors. Only when they are practiced repeatedly do they become traits, forming something like a “Light Triad” that stands in direct opposition to its Dark counterpart. If the Light Triad is to counter the Dark Triad, it must consist of traits that emerge through action, experience, and environmental reinforcement. If the Light Triad traits are to construct systems, institutions, and communities where these traits are not only possible but necessary.

What, then, would be the behavioral equivalents of the Light Triad, my reflection led to these three traits.

1. Generative Agency (Opposed to Machiavellianism) – Instead of manipulative cunning, Light Triad individuals exhibit a proactive drive to create and nurture. Generative agency is an orientation toward building, regenerating, and fostering long-term well-being for others, rather than extracting short-term advantage.

2. Radical Empathy (Opposed to Sociopathy) – Where sociopathy suppresses emotional resonance with others, radical empathy cultivates a deep, actionable understanding of different perspectives, driven by shared responsibility and mutual aid. This is not passive compassion but an active commitment to listening and responding.

3. Relational Integrity (Opposed to Narcissism) – Unlike narcissism, which centers the self at the expense of others, relational integrity prioritizes the maintenance of trust, honesty, and reciprocal respect in all interactions. It is the ability to hold oneself accountable to the well-being of others and to the broader ecological and social systems.

The Multipolar Trap and the “Panopticon for Good”

A particularly thorny obstacle to promoting Light Triad traits in a competitive, profit-driven world is the multipolar trap. This concept describes a situation in which multiple actors—be they individuals, corporations, or nations—race to maximize their own immediate advantage, fearing that failure to do so will leave them at a disadvantage. If no mechanism exists to ensure cooperation, even well-intentioned people may gravitate toward strategies that mirror Dark Triad traits—manipulation, detachment, and self-centeredness—simply to survive or stay competitive.

In such scenarios, the perverse logic of “if I don’t do it, someone else will” takes over. People engage in damaging behaviors—like overexploiting resources or cutting ethical corners—because the only apparent alternative is to risk losing out. Overcoming the multipolar trap demands collective action and shared frameworks that protect individuals from being penalized for cooperative, empathic behavior.

Here, community becomes the antidote—and in some ways, a “panopticon for good.” In a conventional panopticon, people behave because they feel perpetually watched, often leading to conformity and fear of punishment. In a supportive, cooperative community, however, the knowledge that others are observing can encourage the opposite: prosocial behavior that benefits everyone. This community-based “surveillance,” rather than stifling creativity or forcing obedience, acts as a shared moral compass. Individuals are motivated to act in the collective interest because they value how the group sees them. They seek the approval and trust of those whose well-being is interwoven with their own. When social rewards—friendship, support, respect—are tied to Generative Agency, Radical Empathy, and Relational Integrity, each person’s reputation hinges on embodying these traits.

In healthy communities, this communal observation enforces a form of accountability that transcends self-interest. It dismantles the zero-sum, competitive mindset that perpetuates the multipolar trap, instead guiding individuals toward choices that serve the collective well-being. By rendering Dark Triad tactics socially and morally unacceptable, communities effectively prevent exploitative strategies from taking root.

Compliance Versus Commitment: Lessons from Holocaust Rescuers

A historical example powerfully illustrates the difference between superficial compliance and deeply rooted commitment. Studies of Christians who rescued Jews during the Holocaust reveal that these rescuers, compared to bystanders who did nothing, often grew up in households where wrongdoing was met with explanation rather than punitive measures. Instead of being forced to comply with adult authority out of fear, these children learned the deeper reasons behind certain moral expectations.

When they were punished, it was not a matter of mere retribution but an opportunity for understanding why a particular action was harmful. This approach fostered commitment to an internalized moral code, rather than simple obedience to external authority. Many of these individuals, upon witnessing atrocities during the war, acted instinctively in accordance with that internalized sense of right and wrong—risking their own safety to save others. In contrast, those who had only learned to follow orders to avoid punishment lacked the same moral bedrock and, tragically, were more likely to stand by.

This stark difference underlines the necessity of helping people develop genuine commitment to prosocial values, rather than merely forcing them to conform. It mirrors the transformative power of the Light Triad: a set of traits that arise from internal motivation, empathy, and a true understanding of connectedness.

The Feedback Loop of Action and Identity

However, internal motivation is not sufficient. Central to this discussion is the notion that action shapes values more than values shape action. That’s why it’s easier to act you way into a new way of thinking than to think your way into a new way of acting.  If a person frequently engages in small yet consistent acts of service—such as tutoring children in underserved neighborhoods or organizing local clean-up efforts—these actions reinforce a self-image as a caring, accountable individual. Gradually, that self-image solidifies into an internal value system: the more one identifies as a person who helps others, the more likely one is to continue acting in that manner. This feedback loop demonstrates how repeated behaviors create lasting character traits.

Communities that successfully nurture Generative Agency, Radical Empathy, and Relational Integrity do so by providing numerous, accessible ways for individuals to practice these behaviors. Ecovillages and co-housing communities, for instance, might organize regular communal meals, encourage ride-sharing or tool-sharing programs, and involve all members in major decision-making processes. These structures make it not just possible but necessary to participate in cooperative activities, thereby reinforcing Light Triad traits—and shielding participants from the relentless “every person for themselves” logic of the multipolar trap.

Reshaping Systems to Foster Light Triad Traits

Transforming entire societies to reward Light Triad traits is a formidable undertaking, requiring shifts in economic and policy frameworks. Currently, many workplaces and social institutions rely on hierarchical surveillance and competition to maintain order, inadvertently validating Dark Triad traits. A sales team measured solely by quarterly targets, for example, fosters internal rivalry and Machiavellian behavior. A company that only promotes individuals who demonstrate relentless ambition can inadvertently suppress empathy and integrity.

To reverse this, we could imagine policy reforms that incentivize citizen-owned enterprises, where profits and decision-making are shared. Instead of tax cuts, governments could support regional investment funds that help communities establish worker cooperatives, community land trusts, and publicly owned utilities, ensuring economic power remains local and democratic.

Local citizens could organize around their bioregion, restoring watersheds, reintroducing native species, and reviving agroecological practices that regenerate soil and biodiversity. Cross-border watershed cooperatives could protect shared ecosystems, ensuring long-term resilience.

Urban design could prioritize community-run spaces—co-housing, food forests, shared energy microgrids, and repair cafés—embedding mutual aid into daily life rather than making it optional. These suggestions enable a way of living where mutual aid is part of daily life rather than an optional pastime. These changes wouldn’t just be about moral virtue; they would be pragmatic efforts aimed at building resilient communities that can weather social, economic, and ecological crises by tapping into the collective strength of their members.

When people experience how Generative Agency, Radical Empathy, and Relational Integrity generate trust, reliability, and mutual support, they naturally continue to exhibit these traits, creating a self-sustaining cycle. In this sense, community structures—be they local neighborhoods, workplaces, or intentional living groups—provide the shared frameworks, the “panopticon for good,” and the sense of mutual protection needed to counter the multipolar trap.

Sustaining the Light Triad in Action

The initial critique that pointed out the difference between values and traits has led to a deeper understanding of how to translate high-minded ideals into lived reality. While the values of respect, interconnectedness, and stewardship remain essential, they gain real power when manifested in daily habits—so much so that they reshape one’s self-perception, identity, and place in the community. Over time, this consistent behavior gives rise to Generative Agency, Radical Empathy, and Relational Integrity as foundational traits of the “Light Triad.”

Yet we must also acknowledge the game-theoretical realities of the multipolar trap, in which good intentions can be swept aside if they are not collectively upheld. Here, community is the key to breaking out. By establishing shared rules, norms, and trust-based networks, communities protect and elevate prosocial behavior, making the Light Triad not just an ideal but a tangible, thriving reality. When individuals see that empathy, integrity, and cooperation are both valued and rewarded—and gently enforced by a “panopticon for good”—they have the social support necessary to maintain these traits. Instead of merely opposing the Dark Triad in theory, we can collectively build the scaffolding—through our daily decisions, communal initiatives, and systemic designs—that transforms Light Triad values into living, resilient traits for a healthier, more cooperative world.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.