China’s carbon transition playbook

I’m focusing on China for the next two editions of the newsletter. In this edition, I look at a groundbreaking Chinese study of decarbonization pathways for high-carbon industries. In the next edition, I’ll discuss a separate analysis of the remarkable importance of China’s clean energy sector to overall Chinese growth and investment. Both provide evidence, from quite different perspectives, of how important sustainability is now to the Chinese economy and the challenges it still poses.

China’s “Dual Carbon” goals (peak carbon emissions in 2030; carbon neutrality by 2060) require rapid transformation of its high‑emitting industries. Transition finance can accelerate this change, but it depends on the credibility of individual corporate transition plans, something financial institutions cannot assess reliably without authoritative benchmarks.

A recent study – called (this is my translation from the Chinese) “Benchmark Pathways for Decarbonization of China’s Carbon‑Intensive Industries (Transition Finance Context)” – provides China’s first macro‑consistent, climate‑integrated decarbonization pathways for six high‑carbon industries: power, steel, cement, chemicals, non‑ferrous metals, and glass. The study is published by the Beijing Institute of Green Finance and Sustainable Development (IFS).

Using the IFS‑CGE model, the report evaluates four temperature‑aligned scenarios (BAU, 3°C, 2°C, 1.5°C) for 2020-2060. The analysis finds the 2°C scenario to be the most feasible and aligned with China’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC, the country’s commitments under the Paris Agreement), balancing economic stability, technological realism, and climate ambition.

Key findings/requirements/results under the report’s 2°C pathway calculations include:

• A rapid shift from fossil fuels to non‑fossil energy, with 85% primary electricity share by 2060.
• Coal power’s share falling from 63% (2024) to 5% (2060).
• Strong declines in carbon intensity across all high‑carbon sectors.
• Feasible and orderly grid and industrial transformation.
• Reduced long‑term exposure to physical climate risks.

Sector trajectories show near‑full decarbonization of the power sector under this scenario before 2060, and steep emissions‑intensity reductions in steel (-83%), cement (-85%), chemicals (-80%), non-ferrous metals (-85%), and glass (-85%).

These benchmarks are useful because they will help financial institutions to make the first steps in evaluating the scientific soundness and ambition of individual corporate transition plans. They may therefore also help with financial innovation (e.g. transition finance products linked to target trajectories). Setting portfolio‑level emission‑intensity objectives also allows greater clarity on alignment with China’s regulatory expectations and the Paris Agreement.

The study also identifies sectors facing structural decline – which may therefore pose a high stranded‑asset risk. These include coal (its share of power output is projected to fall from 63% to 5% by 2060), cement (output falls ~70%), and steel (output declines steadily to 2060), if this pathway is followed.

Sectors positioned for structural growth include wind and solar power (to account for 54% of power mix by 2060); hydro and nuclear (tripling of output expected), advanced chemicals, specialty materials, non‑ferrous metals, and glass (PV glass in particular).

Future analysis phases will expand the model to additional sectors (construction, real estate, shipping, aviation, ceramics, paper) and refine physical risk integration.

The chart below shows sectoral benchmark decarbonisation targets under this pathway.

Benchmark decarbonisation targets for carbon-intensive industries (2024-2060)

Source: Beijing Institute of Green Finance and Sustainable Development.

This analysis will obviously be refined and improved on in coming months and years. But it’s great to have a report that attempts to quantify what’s needed to meet China’s decarbonisation goals – and what they imply.

This article is also published on LinkedIn. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Track the real‑world impact behind the sustainability headlines. illuminem’s Data Hub™ offers transparent performance data and climate targets of companies driving the transition.