illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Euronews or enjoy below:
🗞️ Driving the news: A new report raises doubts about Big Tech’s claims that AI can significantly reduce emissions, finding that most claims lack credible academic backing
• Only 26% of climate-related AI claims cited peer-reviewed papers, while 36% offered no evidence at all
🔭 The context: AI companies have marketed their technology as a tool for combating climate change, suggesting it could offset emissions from energy-intensive data centers
• However, a deeper look at the evidence reveals a stark contrast between claims and the actual substantiation for those claims
🌍 Why it matters for the planet: If AI is truly to play a role in reducing emissions, its promises need to be backed by solid, peer-reviewed research
• Without clear evidence, there’s a risk that AI might not provide the environmental benefits it’s touted to, leaving emissions reductions far behind the booming energy consumption required for AI systems
⏭️ What’s next: With growing concerns about the environmental impact of AI, experts are calling for stronger, evidence-based claims and better accountability from tech companies
• The industry needs to back up its promises with verifiable data to ensure its sustainability goals align with reality
💬 One quote: “The evidence for massive climate benefits of AI is weak, whilst the evidence of substantial harm is strong,” said Beyond Fossil Fuels
📈 One stat: 36% of the climate-related AI claims examined by Beyond Fossil Fuels didn’t cite any evidence
See on illuminem's Data Hub™ the sustainability performance — carbon credit purchases, total emissions, and climate targets of thousands of companies
Click for more news covering the latest on greenwashing and AI & green tech