What's the carbon footprint of a Christmas tree?

illuminem summarizes for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Le Monde or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: The carbon footprint of Christmas trees, whether natural or artificial, is minor compared to the environmental impact of other holiday activities, such as gift shopping and travel
• However, studies show that natural trees are more eco-friendly than plastic ones, especially if the artificial tree is used for fewer than 20 years

🔭 The context: Christmas trees sold commercially are grown specifically for this purpose, limiting their carbon storage capacity
• Organizations like France’s ADEME note that these trees contribute just 1% to the overall carbon emissions associated with holiday festivities
• Transporting goods and energy-intensive activities during the holidays remain far greater contributors

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: While tree choices matter, the broader carbon footprint of holiday behaviors—like mass consumption and long-distance travel—has a more significant climate impact
• Understanding these dynamics can help individuals make more sustainable choices during the festive season

⏭️ What's next: Experts encourage reducing emissions by focusing on sustainable gift-giving, local purchases, and low-carbon travel options rather than fixating solely on tree selection
• Recycling or composting natural trees after use further minimizes their environmental impact

💬 One quote: “The carbon impact of Christmas trees is difficult to quantify precisely, but it's minuscule compared to the overall carbon footprint of our end-of-year festivities.” – Nabil Wakim, journalist, Le Monde

📈 One stat: Natural Christmas trees have a lower carbon footprint than plastic ones if the latter is used for less than 20 years

Click for more news covering the latest on carbon and sustainable living