What happened when America’s biggest meat companies got called out for greenwashing
Getty Images
Getty Images· 3 min read

⭐ Join our community and access the best we offer!
illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Vox or enjoy below:
🗞️ Driving the news: Two of the world’s largest meat companies — Tyson Foods and JBS — have been forced to scale back major climate claims after legal challenges accused them of misleading the public
• Tyson agreed to stop marketing “climate-friendly” beef and to drop its net-zero-by-2050 claim for at least five years, following a lawsuit by the Environmental Working Group
• JBS settled a similar case with New York’s attorney general, paying $1.1 million and downgrading its “net-zero by 2040” pledge to an “ambition”
• The actions mark a rare moment of accountability for an industry responsible for an estimated 14.5–19% of global greenhouse gas emissions
🔭 The context: The meat and dairy industry has long benefited from weak oversight: in the United States, companies face minimal scrutiny over environmental marketing claims
• At the same time, meat giants have expanded their influence over climate policy forums, including at COP30, where they promoted voluntary sustainability programs while opposing stricter regulation or dietary-shift policies
• Researchers warn that this strategy creates “epistemic pollution” — shaping public perceptions of meat’s climate impact through distorted or unverifiable claims
🌍 Why it matters for the planet: Unchecked greenwashing obscures the true climate footprint of livestock production and delays necessary shifts toward lower-emission diets and farming systems
• Clearer accountability could help align food-sector action with global climate goals and strengthen pathways for emissions reductions in agriculture — one of the most difficult sectors to decarbonise
⏭️ What's next: Advocates expect increased legal scrutiny of environmental claims, with civil society likely to test more cases as companies expand carbon-neutral branding
• The broader question is whether regulators will tighten standards or continue relying on litigation and voluntary measures
💬 One quote: “Consumers deserve honesty and accountability,” said EWG’s Caroline Leary
📈 One stat: Livestock production generates 14.5–19% of global greenhouse gas emissions — more than the entire global transport sector in some estimates
See on illuminem's Data Hub™ the sustainability performance of Tyson Foods, Cargill and their global agrifood peers
Click for more news covering the latest on sustainable agriculture and greenwashing
illuminem briefings

Agriculture · Public Governance
Michael Wright

Agriculture · Environmental Sustainability
Yury Erofeev

Food · Agriculture
The Guardian

Climate Change · Agriculture
The Guardian

Agriculture · Climate Change
earth.com

Agriculture · Mitigation