· 10 min read
This is part one of a four-part series on caring for our built natural environment. You can find part two here, part three here, and part four here.
I am in my eighth decade of existence and believe, rightly or wrongly, that I have gained some perspective on the arc of life on Planet Earth. I have been a part of our global society, and its development, through my years of local, state, national, and international experience in academia, engineering, construction, transportation, natural sciences, management, and leadership. I also enjoy building things of value, physically and metaphorically, in concert with the social, human-built, and natural environments. At my base, I consider myself a scientist, nature, and evidence-based from an early age, valuing the scientific method and, as more evidence comes forth, that conclusions may change. That is in stark contrast to the misinformation in our society today. I have lived a good life, enjoyed the natural world, and benefited from myriad developments. I am proud to have brought some built-natural environment perspective to mitigate, if not improve, our natural environment. These include recycling, asset management, environmental management, infrastructure development to reduce costs and environmental impacts, improvement of habitats and associated species outcomes, and the quality of people’s lives. Unfortunately, they don’t count for much in the greater scheme of life.
As our planet approaches a population of eight billion people (Davies, 2022) (there were about 2.5 billion in 1950 when I was born), I am reminded of the “carrying capacity” (Odom, 1971) which is familiar to ecologists, farmers, ranchers, and conservationists. That is, there is a limit to the number of individuals a habitat, including our global habitat, can sustain. Moreover, risks are growing (World Economic Forum, 2022; Wallace-Wells, 2017; Pulver and Rice, 2022). It is virtually impossible to deny the influence human beings have had on the world, even to the point of creating a new geologic epoch, the Anthropocene (Brondizio et al., 2016).
I do not recall a time as now with as much attention to our natural environment since the days of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962, the United Nations convening the first Earth Summit (the UN Conference on the Human Environment) in 1972, and the Limits to Growth in 1972. There are myriad efforts that have developed: Global Project Management (2023) and myriad series stemming from the 50th Anniversary of the Limits to Growth such as:
50th Anniversary of ‘The Limits to Growth’ Seminar Series (PDF)
National Academies: “Climate Conversations: Tipping Points”
I reviewed some of these growing built-natural environment issues in a series of previous blogs entitled “The Mobility Ecosystem: The Changing Landscape and Need for Fresh, New Ideas” (www.leadershipintransportation.com).
I was shocked to learn that the “Lungs of the Earth” (aka the vast Amazon Rain Forest) has reversed behavior. For the first time in its existence, the Amazon now emits more CO2 than it absorbs due to large-scale human disturbances such as land clearing (Gatti et al., 2021; McCoy, 2022). This is in addition to the continuing degradation and destruction of the Amazon (Watts, 2022). We are also living in the sixth mass extinction of life on earth, partially because of our encroachment into wildlife habitats, and 2020 brought us a pandemic that completely disrupted our global society (Tollefson, 2020).
The efforts this past year are truly remarkable. Initiated partly by a review of the original 1972 Limits to Growth computer model in the book Limits and Beyond: 50 years on from The Limits to Growth. What did we learn, and what’s next” (Bardi and Alvarez, 2022). These efforts include a host of books, articles, webinars, conferences, and other venues on the subject of saving our planet. The 1972 Limits to Growth is still prescient 50 years later, not in details but in major trends.
Some other eclectic and seemingly disparate books have also influenced my thinking this past year, including Five Insights for Avoiding Global Collapse (Herrington, 2022), Earth for All: a survival guide for humanity (Dixon-Decleve et al., 2022), How to be a Stoic (Pigliucci, 2017), The Emperors Handbook (by Marcus Aurelius a translation by Scott and Hicks, 2002), The Standard for Project Management (Project Management Institute, 2021), and The Standard for Program Management (Project Management Institute, 2017). These readings, and others, set the basis for this writing. I have tried to write this to expand program and project managers’ thinking and perspectives as they are in a somewhat unique position to mitigate, if not improve, our built-natural environments. Prieto (2022a) provides another, more detailed discussion of the role of program and project managers in the climate change arena.
While I perused the book The Limits to Growth (Meadows et al., 1972) as an undergraduate and graduate student, I did not fully recognize its relevance.
Now, I find myself increasingly reflecting on what has gone before and what the future will look like.
Simplicity is appropriate, even though the “devil is in the details,” in explaining inherently complex subjects, and I could find no better simple description, vice describing in words, than the figures depicting our natural-built environment challenges, existential and otherwise, as in Herrington’s book (2022). There is another good figure depicting this subject entitled “Integration of Natural Capital and Economic Capital” (Figure 1) found on the inside back cover of Odom and Barrett (2005).
Figure 1. Integration of Natural Capital and Economic Capital (from Odom and Barrett, 2005)
Figure 2 reflects the hierarchy of needs for our planetary existence and the fragility of life on Earth if nature is relegated to the lowest priority. This has some similarities to Maslow’s well-known hierarchy of needs and human motivation to have a stable and successful life (Maslow 1943).
Figure 2. The hierarchy of needs for our planetary existence
Money is perhaps human history’s most successful shared fiction (Goldstein, 2020). We have all been raised in an economic framework, so it feels real, but the capitalist narrative underlying our economic system is purely a human invention, which becomes clear as we replace the issues surrounding this human invention with a purely physical one, such as a threat, disease, injury, or death. In other words, the natural system is what is real and it sometimes takes a traumatic event for us to reset, or see more clearly, our priorities toward life and its attendant features (family, friends, other living things, and generally enjoying what is otherwise a short human life).
In recent decades, there have been increasing efforts to address these built-natural environment challenges and dilemmas. These include environmental laws and regulations, recycling, sustainability, ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) programs and approaches in our society in general but also in the economic and investing arenas (e.g. Fink, 2022). These efforts are all worthwhile but it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain whether these largely unintentionally fragmented efforts have substantial impacts toward a more balanced built-natural environment, or if they are even measuring real impacts (Catanoso, 2022), sometimes referred to as “green-washing” (Robinson, 2022). These efforts are also not without pushback in our crazy political world (Toppe, 2022; Beals, 2023; Ramsey, 2023). ESG risks in engineering and construction must also be considered (Prieto, 2022b, 2023). Another aspect is whether our built environment will bend or break while sustaining our underlying natural environment (Woetzel et al., 2020).
I believe that our current challenges require systems thinking and a program management approach (Prieto, 2021; Project Management Institute, 2022a, 2022b). Program management is a collection of projects with a common interrelationship. What could have more interconnected relationships than our global built-natural environment?
This four-part series is not meant to be comprehensive, a prediction of the future, or a doomsday. Events are moving rapidly so this series may be lagging but the central themes remain the same. It is meant as a very broad review of our current planetary situation. What I know with certainty is that we will succeed or fail in caring for our planet—together. It is our common mother ship.
“We can’t impose our will on a system. We can listen to what the system tells us, and discover how its properties and our values can work together to bring forth something much better than could ever be produced by our will alone.”
—Donella Meadows
This article is also published on the author's blog. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.
Literature cited
Aurelius, M. (2002). The Emperor’s Handbook: A New Translation of The Meditations. Simon and Schuster.
Bardi, U., & Pereira, C. Á. (2022). Limits and beyond: 50 years on from the limits to growth, what did we learn and what’s next?: A report to the Club of Rome. Exapt Press.
Beal, R.K. (2023, January 23). Climate investing is ‘a matter of value, not values,’ says State Street’s O’Hanley. MarketWatch. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.marketwatch.com/story/climate-investing-is-a-matter-of-value-not-values-says-state-streets-ohanley-11674497141
Brondizio, E. S., O’Brien, K. F. a. R., Bai, X., Biermann, F., Steffen, W., Berkhout, F., Cudennec, C., Lemos, M. C., Wolfe, A. P., Palma-Oliveira, J. M., & Chen, C. (2016). Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: A call for collaboration. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 39, 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.006
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Catanoso, J. (2022, December 23). The Netherlands to stop paying subsidies to ‘untruthful’ biomass firms. Mongabay. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://news.mongabay.com/2022/12/the-netherlands-decides-to-stop-paying-subsidies-to-untruthful-biomass-firms/
Davies, L. (2022, October 19). UN warns against alarmism as world’s population reaches 8bn milestone. Global Development | the Guardian. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/oct/18/global-population-growth-8-billion-unfdp-united-nations-warning-alarmism
Dixon-Decleve, S., Gaffney, O., Ghosh, J., Randers, J., Rockstrom, J., & Stoknes, P. E. (2022). Earth for All: a survival guide for humanity. New Society Publishers.
Larry Fink’s Annual 2022 Letter to CEOs | BlackRock. (n.d.). The Power of Capitalism. BlackRock. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter
Gatti, L.V., L.S. Basso, J.B. Miller, M. Gloor, L.G. Domingues, H.L.G. Cassol, G. Tejada, L.E.O.C. Aragão, C. Nobre, W. Peters, L. Marani, E. Arai, A.H. Sanches, S.M. Corrêa, L.A. Anderson, C. Von Randow, C.S.C. Correia, S.P. Crispim & R.A.L. Neves. (2021) Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change. Nature. 595: 388–93, 2021. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03629-6
Global Project Management. (2023). The GPM P5 Standard for Sustainability in Project Management. Version 3. GPM. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://gpm.sharefile.com/share/view/s1b99a8ea70f74018afd1ef802870cd3f?skipNativeCheck=true
Goldstein, J. (2020). Money: The True Story of a Made-up Thing. Atlantic Books.
Herrington, G. (2022). Five Insights for Avoiding Global Collapse: What a 50-Year-Old Model of the World Taught Me About a Way Forward for Us Today. Mdpi AG.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
McCoy, T. (2022, November 18). The Amazon, Undone. How the Forest Dies. The Washington Post. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2022/amazon-brazil-tipping-point/
Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, & W.W. Behrens III (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Next Generation Earth Systems Science at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Odum, E. P. (1967). Fundamentals of Ecology. Cengage.
Odom, Eugene P. and Gary W. Barrett (2005). Fundamentals of Ecology. 5th Edition. Belmont, CA: Thompson Books/Cole.
Prieto, R. (2021). Reversing Global Warming. PM World Journal. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Prieto/publication/349859315_Reversing_Global_Warming/links/6044533c92851c077f212159/Reversing-Global-Warming.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Prieto, R. (2022a). Climate Change: the role of program and project managers. National Academy of Construction Executive Insights. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363752757
Prieto, R. (2022b). Enterprise Risk Management in the Engineering and Construction Industry. PM World Journal. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Prieto/publication/360449837_Enterprise_Risk_Management_in_the_Engineering_and_Construction_Industry/links/6276aba73a23744a726bc8c9/Enterprise-Risk-Management-in-the-Engineering-and-Construction-Industry.pdf?origin=publication_detail 2022b
Prieto, R. (2023). Environmental, Societal, and Governance (ESG) Risks in Engineering and Construction Key Points. National Academy of Construction Executive Insights. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368425991_Environmental_Social_and_Governance_ESG_Risks_in_Engineering_and_Construction_Key_Points
Project Management Institute (2017). The Standard for Program Management, 4th Edition, Independent Chicago: Publishers Group
Project Management Institute. (2021). The Standard for Project Management, 7th Edition. Chicago: Independent Publishers Group
Project Management Institute. (2022a). The ESG Imperative: Turning Words into Action. Project Management Institute. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/the-esg-imperative.pdf?v=e40c0e04-3e49-435d-a0ad-fe87157c876c
Project Management Institute (2022b). Global Megatrends 2022. Project Management Institute. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pmi-megatrends-2022.pdf?v=2991b894-7efb-411c-a780-50968d45a959&sc_lang_temp=en
Pulver, D.V. and D. Rice. (2022, February 28). UN panel’s grim climate change report: ‘Parts of the planet will become uninhabitable.’ USA Today. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://news.yahoo.com/un-panels-grim-climate-change-110051486.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
Ramsey, A.R. (2023, March 3). Trillions at Stake as 401(k)s Become ESG Political Footballs. Bloomberg Law. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trillions-at-stake-as-401ks-become-esg-political-footballs
Robinson, D. (2022, November 13). What is Greenwashing? Earth.Org. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://earth.org/what-is-greenwashing/
Tollefson, Jeff (2020, August 7)). Why deforestation and extinctions make pandemics more likely. Nature 584: 175–76. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02341-1
Toppe, J. (2022, December 8). BlackRock’s ESG push puts CEO Larry Fink in activist crosshairs. Fox Business. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/blackrocks-esg-push-puts-ceo-larry-fink-activist-crosshairs
Wallace-Wells, D. (2017, July 10). The Uninhabitable Earth. New York. Retrieved March 26, 2023 (updated), from https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/07/climate-change-earth-too-hot-for-humans.html
Watts, J. (2022, December 16). Witness to paradise being lost: my year in the dying Amazon. The Guardian. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/16/year-in-the-life-of-the-amazon-deforestation-climate-disaster-mass-extermination, 2022
Woetzel, J. and D. Pinner, H. Smadari, H. Engel, M. Krishnan, B. Boland, P. Cooper, & B. Ruby. (2020, August 19). Will infrastructure bend or break under climate stress? McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/will-infrastructure-bend-or-break-under-climate-stress
World Economic Forum. (2022). The Global Risks Report 2022. World Economic Forum. Retrieved March 26, 2023, from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf
