background imageUnsplash

Trump administration orders half of national forests open for logging

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on The Washington Post or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: The Trump administration has revoked environmental protections across more than half of U.S. Forest Service lands—about 120 million acres—in an emergency directive designed to ramp up timber production by 25%
The move, championed by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, eliminates key environmental review processes and accelerates logging permits, citing wildfire risk and forest health concerns

🔭 The context: This marks a stark reversal from the Biden-era forest policy, which prioritized conservation and climate resilience, including bans on logging in old-growth forests
The new order reactivates Trump-era forest management philosophies from his first term, where boosting domestic wood supply and minimizing regulatory oversight were top priorities
Critics, including forestry scientists, warn that logging large trees can make forests more vulnerable—not less—to wildfires, and weakens natural carbon storage.

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: Forests are essential carbon sinks, absorbing nearly a third of fossil fuel emissions globally each year
Stripping protections threatens biodiversity, accelerates habitat loss, and could undermine U.S. climate goals by targeting mature trees critical for carbon sequestration
While forest management is needed to address fire risk, experts emphasize strategic thinning of underbrush—not industrial logging—as the sustainable path forward
Fast-tracked operations may sacrifice ecological integrity for short-term economic gain.

⏭️ What's next: The Forest Service will immediately begin implementing the new rules, bypassing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures that typically safeguard public lands
Legal challenges are expected from environmental groups and Indigenous communities concerned about cultural site destruction and ecosystem degradation
Meanwhile, the timber industry is likely to see a surge in activity and profits, but the longer-term implications for forest health, water security, and wildfire resilience remain uncertain—especially with no mention of climate considerations in the directive

💬 One quote: “You can’t log your way out of fire danger,” a forestry expert told The Washington Post, cautioning against large-scale commercial removal of fire-resistant trees

📈 One stat: Nearly 67 million acres under the directive are classified as “high” or “very high” wildfire risk—raising stakes for how forest health is addressed

See on illuminem's Data Hub™ the sustainability performance of Weyerhaeuser and its peers Westrock, and Sappi

Click for more news covering the latest on public governance and biodiversity 

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)