background imageAssociated Press (AP)

Top UN court says countries can sue each other over climate change

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on BBC News or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued a landmark advisory opinion confirming that countries can sue each other over climate change harms, including for historical emissions
The court ruled that states have legal obligations under international law to prevent environmental harm — even beyond commitments in the Paris Agreement
While non-binding, the ruling could reshape global climate litigation, opening new legal avenues for vulnerable nations seeking climate-related compensation

🔭 The context: This case was initiated by Pacific Island students and formally brought by Vanuatu and other climate-vulnerable nations frustrated with global inaction
It builds on momentum from other international courts — including a recent Inter-American Court opinion — and increasing climate lawsuits worldwide
Historically, legal accountability for climate change has been limited by jurisdiction and scientific uncertainty over attribution 

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: The decision affirms that all states — even those outside the Paris Agreement — must act to protect the climate system
It reinforces legal arguments for holding high-emitting countries accountable for climate damages, particularly through compensation claims
It also puts pressure on governments to ensure domestic fossil fuel subsidies and approvals do not breach international obligations

⏭️ What's next: Countries like Vanuatu, the Marshall Islands, and others are now exploring legal action for climate-related damages, potentially in national courts citing the ICJ’s opinion
While major emitters like the US and China have not accepted ICJ jurisdiction, the ruling could influence legal strategies globally, especially in courts where these countries are bound
National governments will be closely scrutinizing the ruling’s implications for their climate and energy policies, particularly regarding fossil fuel subsidies and project approvals

💬 One quote: “With today’s authoritative historic ruling, the International Court of Justice has broken with business-as-usual... those suffering the impacts of climate devastation have a right to remedy for climate harm,” – Joie Chowdhury, Senior Attorney, Centre for International Environmental Law (CIEL)

📈 One stat: Between 2000 and 2019, climate change-related losses were estimated at $2.8 trillion globally — equivalent to $16 million per hour (Nature, 2023)

Explore carbon credit purchases, total emissions, and climate targets of thousands of companies on Data Hub™ — the first platform designed to help sustainability providers generate sales leads!

Click for more news covering the latest on environmental rights and public governance

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)