background image

The Uninhabitable Earth gives us reasons both for optimism and alarm

author image

By Valentina Hernandez Gomez

· 2 min read


‘Carbon neutral’, ‘net zero’, ‘carbon emissions’ and ‘mass extinction’. Climate change can seem to be tangled in a sea of unintelligible terms for the general public.

They become familiar, they become part of the media landscape we consume daily and yet, many are still clueless about their meaning and impact on their lives.

One of my main challenge as a Climate & Sustainability Editor is striking the fine balance between informing and educating. I deeply believe in the power of education and the power that informed citizenship can hold.

The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace-Wells

I’ve publicly spoken about this book before and I consider it one of the best ones to get learning about climate change.

Wallace-wells explains in layman’s terms how our life will look like ‘after-warming’… Spoiler? It’s not looking great, he opens with: “It is worse, much worse, than you think.”

David Wallace-Wells, born in the US, is a historian and journalist for The New Yorker. Through four chapters: Cascades, Elements of Chaos, The Climate Kaleidoscope, and The Anthropic Principle, he takes us on a rather unpleasant journey.

A journey along our own faults and failures as a species and the consequences that await us: Hunger, drowning, wildfire, disasters -no longer natural-, dying oceans, and so on.

The book has strong research and scientific background at its core, which not only makes it informative but reliable.

What strikes the most is how current Wallace-wells prose feels.

Just in July, while I was reading this book, the United Kingdom reached record temperatures of over 40 degrees Celsius.

In the chapter ‘Elements of Chaos,’ lies the heat death: “How much hotter will it get? The question may sound scientific, inviting expertise, but the answer is almost entirely human- which is to say, political.”

How often are you reading a book about the future while its predictions are materialising in the present? That seems to be the case for most works on climate change, we’re driving directly towards an evitable precipice.

Both Wallace-Wells and I have something in common, despite all the odds against us, the clock ticking and the governments shortfalls, we both agree on this line: “Call me crazy, or better yet naive, but I still think we can.”

This article is also published on B24/7. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

Valentina Hernandez Gomez is a Carbon Policy Analyst at Abatable, where she creates policy briefings and thought leadership content on carbon markets with a focus on Latin America and the Caribbean. She previously served as a Business and Human Rights Researcher at Bendi, working closely with engineering and data science teams to identify and assess human rights risks. Valentina has also contributed as a Science Writer for BBC Science Focus and was the first Climate and Sustainability Editor at Bristol24/7, focusing on climate journalism and community action.

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)