background image

The Net-Zero Industry Act – a welcome spotlight and a warning bell for CO2 storage

author image

By Luciana Miu

· 4 min read


The European Commission has recently published the Net-Zero Industry Act, a proposal meant to boost the Union’s autonomy when it comes to developing and manufacturing “net-zero technologies”. The Act lists carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) as one of eight key net-zero technologies for achieving the EU’s climate neutrality goals, sets a goal for storing 50 million tonnes of CO2 per year in the EU by 2030, and mandates Member States to clearly state how they will enable carbon capture and storage (CCS). These targets imply a massive roll-out of CO2 storage projects in the EU over the next decades, whose deployment is expected to be further detailed in the Commission’s forthcoming CCUS strategy. This is a welcome spotlight on CCS as a solution to mitigate residual, hard-to-abate emissions and enable negative emissions, but also a warning bell for the growing CCS project pipeline to be implemented in a just, efficient, and transparent way. This means appropriate public engagement, particularly of local communities affected by the construction and operation of large-scale CO2 storage infrastructure.

One of the most important provisions of the Net-Zero Industry Act, when it comes to CCS, is that it breaks the “chicken-and-egg” cycle by specifically assigning to oil and gas producers the responsibility of making CO2 storage capacity available to achieve the CO2 storage target. Oil and gas companies such as Total and Equinor have already been heavily involved in the European portfolio of commercial-scale CCS projects, which was very sparse until recently. Despite the project pipeline having grown considerably in these last several years, by 2020 only 35.4 million tonnes of CO2 had been captured and stored (one ten-thousandth of Europe’s estimated capacity, and well below the yearly target for 2030). The obligations of the Net-Zero Industry Act for oil and gas producers, as well as the sheer size in the gap in CO2 storage that must be plugged by 2030, means that the EU will see a significant ramp-up in CO2 storage activity by oil and gas companies. It also means that these oil and gas companies will need to make a significant effort to engage citizens and institutions, and to prepare their CO2 storage sites in a way that is aligned with principles of good governance and procedural justice – namely, ensuring that communities are an integral part of the whole process of exploring, preparing, using, and managing CO2 storage sites.

Why is this a warning bell? Firstly, because as far as Europe has examples of good governance and public engagement for deploying CO2 storage projects, it has examples of failed ones. These can lead to the delay or even cancellation of CCS projects, but more importantly to a missed opportunity when it comes to engaging citizens and institutions with “net-zero technologies”. Transparency, fairness, and robust public engagement in CO2 storage projects are essential to build trust in CCS and can serve as an example for the largescale rollout of other “net-zero technologies. Secondly, engaging citizens with the CO2 storage projects deployed in their backyards is a basic tenet of procedural justice. Any reticence of project developers to fully inform the public of the necessity, benefits, and costs of CO2 storage will only detract from a fair implementation of the transition to climate neutrality. The deployment of CO2 storage as a tool to reach net zero emissions will only be as legitimate as it is just. Thirdly and finally, in a world of technology optionality, members of the public will be bombarded with an increasing number of carefully selected snippets of information about the new projects, products and services emerging from the race to low-carbon. Informing and engaging citizens and institutions with CO2 storage, CCUS, and indeed all net-zero technologies, is essential for them to make informed choices. CCUS is not a single technology, and every application will be different. Some applications, such as certain pathways for carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) may not contribute to climate mitigation at all. The discernment necessary to push forward only those applications that are truly beneficial comes with timely and transparent communication by objective messengers. And it is never too early to start.

CO2 storage and CCS will play a big role in the EU’s race to reach net zero emissions. The NetZero Industry Act highlights this, and future policy measures will only strengthen it. But this role risks to be shelved if it is not brought squarely into the public view. After all, few successful roles are ever played in the dark.

This article is also published by Energy Policy Group. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

Luciana Miu is the Head of Clean Economy at Energy Policy Group. She holds a Master’s degree in Sustainable Energy Systems from the University of Edinburgh and a PhD in Energy Efficiency of Residential Buildings from the Imperial College London. Before joining EPG, Luciana worked for the UK Parliament and for the British Government’s Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), as well as a consultant for Climate-KIC and London City Hall.

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)