illuminem summarizes for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Financial Times or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: The Royal Society, a centuries-old British scientific academy, has refused to specifically blame oil and gas companies for their role in climate change, despite pressure from over 2,000 UK academics
• This stance is part of a broader debate over the influence of fossil fuel industries on scientific research and climate policy

🔭 The context: The debate centers around the Royal Society's refusal to issue a statement condemning the fossil fuel industry's culpability in driving the climate crisis
• This comes amidst allegations of undisclosed ties between industry representatives and academic figures in influential positions

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: This conflict highlights the ongoing tension between the fossil fuel industry's role in global warming and the scientific community's efforts to address climate change
• It raises questions about the integrity of scientific endorsements and the influence of corporate funding on climate-related research

⏭️ What's next: The discord may lead to increased scrutiny of academic-industry partnerships and could influence future policies on how institutions engage with fossil fuel companies, especially in terms of funding and transparency in research

💬 One quote: “This decision not to clearly attribute the role of fossil fuel groups in climate change is mind-boggling,” stated Bill McGuire, professor of geophysical and climate hazards at University College London

📈 One stat: Fossil fuels are responsible for over 75% of global greenhouse gas emissions. This includes carbon dioxide emissions from burning coal, oil, and natural gas, which are the main drivers of global warming.n the article

Click for more news covering the latest on energy