background imageCNN

Re-freezing the Arctic? A giant sea curtain? High-tech efforts to save the ice sheets are doomed, report finds

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on CNN or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: High-tech proposals to save the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets — including giant sea curtains, pumping seawater, solar geoengineering, and scattering reflective glass beads — are considered unfeasible and potentially dangerous, according to a new scientific report
• The study reviewed five prominent polar geoengineering methods and found that none are viable at scale, all carry significant environmental risks, and all would be expensive to implement
• Lead author Martin Siegert warns that while well-intentioned, these interventions could irreparably damage fragile polar ecosystems and distract from the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions

🔭 The context: Melting ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are major contributors to rising sea levels, threatening coastal populations worldwide
• Proposals like refreezing Arctic ice or building 50-mile sea curtains have gained attention from researchers, start-ups, and investors, but have never been robustly tested in real-world conditions
• The report highlights both the logistical challenges of operating in extreme polar environments and the risks of unintended consequences, from harming marine life to altering global climate patterns

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: Ice sheet loss drives global sea-level rise, with impacts on millions of people, ecosystems, and economies
• Failure of these high-tech interventions could waste billions of dollars and precious time, while global warming continues unabated
• The study emphasizes that emissions reductions remain the only proven solution to slowing ice sheet melt

⏭️ What's next: Scientists urge continued research and debate on polar geoengineering, but stress that it cannot replace immediate climate action
• Policymakers and funders are faced with weighing potential experimental interventions against the proven benefits of rapid decarbonization
• Ongoing trials, such as pumping seawater in Cambridge Bay, highlight the growing interest — but scalability and environmental safety remain major hurdles

💬 One quote: “The polar regions are fragile, pristine systems and once they’re disturbed and ruined, they are ruined forever.” — Martin Siegert, University of Exeter

📈 One stat: Each proposed polar geoengineering intervention would cost at least $10 billion, with sea curtains projected at $80 billion over a decade for a 50-mile installation

Explore carbon credit purchases, total emissions, and climate targets of thousands of companies on Data Hub™ — the first platform designed to help sustainability providers generate sales leads!

Click for more news covering the latest on climate change

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)