background image

Ocean-based carbon storage ramps up, bringing investment and concern

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Mongabay or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: Governments and industries are accelerating the development of offshore carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, aiming to store captured emissions in depleted marine oil and gas wells or subsea aquifers
Major initiatives are underway in the North Sea, Gulf of Mexico, and Southeast Asia, supported by public and private investment
Advocates call it a key tool for decarbonising “hard-to-abate” sectors such as steel, cement, and chemicals — but concerns are rising over environmental risks, cost, and long-term effectiveness

🔭 The context: Offshore CCS leverages the fossil fuel sector's existing infrastructure, repurposing platforms and pipelines to store CO₂ below the seabed
Although over 70 CCS facilities operate globally, most are onshore; only a few offshore projects currently exist in countries like Norway, Brazil, and China
Yet dozens of new multi-billion-dollar proposals are in development, backed by climate strategies such as the EU's target to store 50 million metric tons of CO₂ annually by 2030

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: While CCS could support decarbonisation of sectors lacking viable alternatives, the technology is resource-intensive and comes with environmental risks, including potential leakage, ocean acidification, and harm to marine ecosystems
Its close ties to the fossil fuel industry raise concerns that it may prolong hydrocarbon use rather than curtail it
Critics argue that the focus on CCS diverts critical funding away from proven renewable energy solutions

⏭️ What's next: The next few years will be critical for offshore CCS as large-scale projects like Northern Lights (Norway) and Greensand (Denmark) ramp up
Key challenges ahead include scaling infrastructure, ensuring stringent monitoring, and developing independent regulatory frameworks
Whether CCS can deliver durable climate gains or merely serve as a costly stopgap remains under scrutiny, especially amid growing calls for transparent data and robust environmental safeguards

💬 One quote: “There’s a high risk of being cavalier with CO₂ … It just seems like a series of triage and bandages that are trying to extend the life of a problem rather than solving it.” – Grant Hauber, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis

📈 One stat: The EU estimates it will need 7,300 kilometers of CO₂ pipelines by 2030 to meet its offshore storage goals — at an estimated cost of €19.5 billion ($22.6 billion)

Explore carbon credit purchases, total emissions, and climate targets of thousands of companies on Data Hub™ — the first platform designed to help sustainability providers generate sales leads!

Click for more news covering the latest on carbon capture & storage

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)