It may be time for L.A. to ditch the palm tree

illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on The Washington Post or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: Amid worsening wildfires and rising temperatures, experts and officials in Los Angeles are questioning the future of palm trees — long considered iconic to the city’s skyline
• Critics argue that palms offer little shade and pose serious fire risks due to their flammable fronds and towering structure
• The city is now prioritising the planting of native, shade-giving trees that better suit a hotter, drier climate

🔭 The context: Palm trees, none of which are native to L.A., were widely planted in the 20th century, especially ahead of the 1932 Olympics
• Once a symbol of glamour and sunshine, they are now seen as poorly adapted to current environmental conditions
• Many are already dying out due to disease and lack of replacement planting

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: Shifting from palms to native species enhances urban biodiversity, provides critical shade to combat heat inequality, and reduces wildfire risk
• Greener, climate-resilient urban landscapes are essential in cities like L.A., where warming exceeds global averages
• Native trees like oaks also support more local wildlife and help with carbon sequestration.

⏭️ What's next: City officials and private developers are planting fewer palms and favouring native trees like California live oaks
• While some palms may remain in historic or symbolic areas, widespread replacement seems inevitable
• Future urban forestry decisions will need to balance climate adaptation with cultural identity

💬 One quote: "Let’s focus on those that are going to be the biggest and heaviest hitters when it comes to habitat and cooling." – Rachel Malarich, City Forest Officer for Los Angeles

📈 One stat: Los Angeles maintains around 100,000 palm trees, mostly planted in the 20th century

Click for more news covering the latest on climate change adaptation