background image

Here’s what to know about nations considering the 1st global tax on emissions for shipping

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on The Associated Press or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: This week, member states of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) are negotiating what could become the world’s first global carbon tax on shipping emissions
Meeting in London, the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee is reviewing proposals to introduce a flat-rate levy on greenhouse gas emissions from vessels and to establish a new marine fuel standard—both aimed at achieving net-zero emissions for the maritime sector by around 2050 

🔭 The context: Shipping currently accounts for roughly 3% of global emissions and remains one of the few major sectors without a pricing mechanism for carbon
In 2023, IMO nations agreed on a climate strategy, but stopped short of binding targets for 2050. Now, the challenge is to translate those ambitions into enforceable regulations
The proposals being discussed represent a turning point in global climate diplomacy for a sector that has historically operated outside domestic emission frameworks

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: A global carbon levy could significantly accelerate the adoption of zero-emission fuels like green methanol, ammonia, and hydrogen, currently far costlier than traditional heavy fuel oil
It would also ensure that shipping aligns with international climate goals and does not become a loophole in decarbonisation efforts
Importantly, revenue from such a levy could be redirected to support climate-vulnerable nations and help modernise fleets in the Global South, ensuring a just transition

⏭️ What's next: Should the committee reach consensus this week, final text for the carbon pricing and fuel standards could be adopted in October 2025, with implementation by 2027
Negotiations remain divided: over 60 countries, led by Pacific Island states, favour a flat-rate levy, while others—such as China, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa—prefer a credit trading system
A compromise may emerge, but stakeholders warn that anything less than a universal, ambitious levy could undermine the IMO’s climate credibility and delay vital infrastructure investment

💬 One quote: “For the first time, we will have, hopefully, an effective global framework tackling this international issue.” - Emma Fenton of Opportunity Green

📈 One stat: International shipping is responsible for approximately 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, yet remains largely unregulated under national climate policies

See here detailed sustainability performance of companies like Maersk, and Hapag-Lloyd

Click for more news covering the latest on carbon and sustainable maritime

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)