'Greenhushing': Are businesses staying silent about climate pledges?

⭐ Join our community and access the best we offer!

illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on BBC or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: A wave of corporate “greenhushing” — the practice of downplaying or withholding climate commitments — is drawing attention as companies navigate politicized scrutiny, regulatory complexity and fear of being accused of greenwashing
• While the phenomenon has been linked to the Trump administration’s pro-fossil-fuel stance, new research shows the trend predates U.S. political shifts and stems largely from legal, reputational and compliance pressures across multiple markets

🔭 The context: The term emerged in 2022 when climate consultancy South Pole found that many firms were setting science-based climate targets but avoiding public disclosure
• Since then, companies have faced evolving ESG rules in the U.S. and Europe, rising anti-ESG political rhetoric, and lawsuits targeting both overstated and understated climate claims
• At the same time, global corporate climate pledges have expanded, with several studies showing many firms accelerating sustainability initiatives despite political headwinds

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: Opaque corporate climate communication weakens market transparency, undermines accountability, and risks slowing investment in decarbonization
• Clear disclosure is essential for tracking real emissions reductions, aligning corporate plans with science-based pathways, and enabling regulators, investors and consumers to assess progress
• The shift away from exaggerated claims may strengthen integrity, but prolonged silence could hide slower action at a time when global emissions must fall sharply to meet 1.5°C-aligned trajectories

⏭️ What’s next: Companies will need to adapt to tightening anti-greenwashing rules, including the EU’s Green Transition Directive, while balancing divergent U.S. state-level ESG policies
• Analysts expect a recalibration rather than retreat, with firms increasingly focusing on verifiable emissions cuts instead of offsets
• As investors and customers continue demanding credible sustainability strategies, experts anticipate more transparent, evidence-based communication once regulatory uncertainty stabilizes

💬 One quote: “Firms navigate a complex landscape where they can be sued for saying too little — and sued for saying too much,” South Pole notes

📈 One stat: In South Pole’s 2022 analysis, 25% of companies had science-based climate targets they did not publicly disclose — one of the earliest large-scale indicators of greenhushing

See on illuminem's Data Hub™ the sustainability performance of PwC, HSBC , and major financial institutions previously in the Net Zero Banking Alliance

Click for more news covering the latest on corporate sustainability