background imageUnsplash

First climate case involving anti-Mafia law is dismissed

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 3 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on POLITICO or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: A federal judge has dismissed the first U.S. climate lawsuit invoking anti-Mafia racketeering laws (RICO), brought by over 30 Puerto Rican municipalities against major oil companies
The plaintiffs argued that the industry conspired to deceive the public about climate risks and bore responsibility for the devastation caused by Hurricane Maria in 2017, which killed an estimated 3,000 people
The judge ruled the case could not proceed, citing the need to avoid creating bad legal precedent in response to emotionally charged issues

🔭 The context: Filed in 2022, the case marked a novel legal strategy by applying the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)—traditionally used to target organized crime—to climate litigation
The plaintiffs accused the fossil fuel industry of a decades-long misinformation campaign that directly exacerbated the intensity of recent storms in Puerto Rico
While dozens of U.S. cities and states have launched climate accountability suits, none had previously invoked RICO statutes

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: The dismissal is a setback for climate litigation seeking to hold corporations accountable for climate damages under expansive legal theories
It underscores the legal challenges in connecting fossil fuel emissions to specific weather events and in using criminal frameworks like RICO for environmental cases
The ruling may deter similar lawsuits, but also refocus legal efforts on consumer protection, nuisance, and tort law pathways that have gained traction in U.S. courts

⏭️ What's next: The plaintiffs are expected to appeal the decision to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Legal experts anticipate the case could eventually reach the Supreme Court, especially given its novel approach
Other climate liability cases are proceeding under state law in jurisdictions such as California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts, with several entering discovery or nearing trial
Broader implications for climate litigation strategies will hinge on appellate outcomes

💬 One quote: “It is the duty of all courts of justice to take care, for the general good of the community, that hard cases do not make bad law,” wrote Judge Silvia Carreño-Coll in her ruling

📈 One stat: Hurricane Maria caused an estimated $90 billion in damage and resulted in approximately 3,000 deaths, making it one of the deadliest and costliest natural disasters in U.S. history.

Explore carbon credit purchases, total emissions, and climate targets of thousands of companies on Data Hub™ — the first platform designed to help sustainability providers generate sales leads!

Click for more news covering the latest on climate change and ethical governance

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)