· 3 min read
illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Deutsche Welle or enjoy below:
🗞️ Driving the news: Europe's booming voluntary carbon credit market is under fire amid growing evidence of flawed and misleading offset projects
• In Estonia, a carbon scheme planted 120,000 trees on biodiverse wetlands near Lake Võrtsjärv, displacing native bird habitats — only to be later reversed by environmental authorities
• The case highlights deeper concerns over the environmental integrity and regulation of carbon offsetting practices across the continent
🔭 The context: Voluntary carbon markets allow companies to compensate for emissions by purchasing credits, often to meet ESG goals or attract green finance
• These schemes operate alongside more regulated mechanisms like the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)
• However, the voluntary market, valued at $2 billion in 2023, remains lightly regulated and susceptible to manipulation, greenwashing, and in some cases, outright fraud — often described as being exploited by so-called “Carbon Cowboys”
🌍 Why it matters for the planet: When poorly designed, carbon offset projects risk doing more harm than good — destroying ecosystems, undermining biodiversity, and giving companies a license to pollute without cutting their own emissions
• Studies suggest that less than 16% of voluntary carbon credits deliver actual emissions reductions
• Meanwhile, credible removals (e.g., biochar or direct air capture) remain underfunded due to higher costs
This discrepancy distorts climate progress and erodes public trust
⏭️ What's next: The EU has introduced a new regulatory framework for certifying carbon removals, focusing on transparency, scientific rigor, and permanence
• New market players like Arbonics are adopting stricter site-screening and monitoring methods, while major buyers such as Microsoft are shifting towards high-integrity offsets
• As demand rises, the pressure is mounting on governments and market platforms to enforce robust safeguards and penalise greenwashing
💬 One quote: “Too often, companies use credits to claim neutrality without really cutting their carbon emissions — and that is the real problem.” — Jonathan Crook, Carbon Market Watch
📈 One stat: A 2023 Nature Communications study found that only 16% of carbon credits in the voluntary market result in genuine emissions reductions
Explore carbon credit purchases, total emissions, and climate targets of thousands of companies on Data Hub™ — the first platform designed to help sustainability providers generate sales leads!
Click for more news covering the latest on carbon markets and ethical governance
