· 5 min read
When Beijing’s National Development & Reform Commission quietly issued its first renewable-electricity mandates for steel, cement, polysilicon and new data-centre hubs on 11 July, it jolted the backbone of the world’s largest manufacturing powerhouse. For the first time, smokestack sectors that account for a double-digit share of global CO₂ must source a defined slice of their power from renewables—up to 70% in hydro-rich Yunnan, and no less than 80% for new data centres nationwide. In short, heavy industry must buy “green”, and market participants know the new quotas will flow straight into China’s fledgling contract-for-difference scheme that cushions renewable generators from low market prices.
Why this might look regenerative
Regeneration isn’t just about doing less harm — it’s about designing systems that create conditions for life to thrive. That means structuring flows of energy, materials, finance, and knowledge in ways that restore ecosystems, strengthen communities, and generate long-term value. A regenerative system doesn’t extract and deplete — it heals, renews, and contributes more than it takes. Whether we’re talking about farming, industry, finance, or policy, the goal is the same: to shift from degenerative models of extraction to regenerative models of relationship, reciprocity, and resilience. So, why might this policy adopted by China look regenerative?
1. Leverage at the right systems node. Targeting upstream, energy-hungry materials means every tonne of “green” steel or lower-carbon cement ripples through supply chains—from skyscrapers to solar panels—cutting embodied emissions at scale.
2. Capital shift from fossil to renewable ecosystems. Long-term power-purchase deals needed to satisfy the quotas de-risk new wind and solar projects, accelerating the build-out of a cleaner, more distributed grid.
3. Health and water co-benefits. Fewer coal kilns mean improved air quality around industrial clusters leading to better health outcomes; and renewable electricity uses a fraction of the water consumed by thermal plants—solar PV draws as little as 2–15% of coal’s water per megawatt-hour, and wind even less.
Caveats through a regenerative lens
While China’s sector-specific renewable-electricity quotas are rightly being hailed as a major pivot, when viewed through a regenerative lens we have to probe the policy’s blind spots and hidden trade-offs.
First, consider where the clean power will come from. Hydro-rich Yunnan can meet its 70% quota largely by tapping new dam capacity. Yet, the push for additional mega-projects on the Salween (Nu) River and other upper-Mekong tributaries threatens some of Asia’s last free-flowing waters, undermining Indigenous food systems and biodiversity just as the region is trying to restore ecological resilience. If regeneration means enhancing, not impairing, the health of living systems, large dams that submerge forests and disrupt sediment flows work against that goal.
At the other end of the spectrum, coal still lurks in the wings. Beijing’s April guidelines allow new “flexible” coal plants to be built through 2027 to backstop renewables. Officially these plants are supposed to run at very low utilization, but once capital is sunk they generate powerful lock-in pressures, potentially offsetting the emission cuts the quotas are meant to deliver. From a regenerative standpoint, investing in assets whose profitability depends on continued extraction of fossil fuels risks perpetuating the very degenerative dynamics the policy seeks to reverse.
A subtler limitation lies in the metric itself. Because the quotas are percentage-based, an iron-or-cement factory can still grow its absolute electricity consumption—and its total carbon footprint—so long as the renewable share keeps pace. That may satisfy an accounting framework, but it falls short of the absolute reductions scientists say are needed for planetary stability. Moreover, provincial ambitions vary wildly—from 70% in Yunnan to just 10.8% in Chongqing—raising questions about enforcement and the risk of “paper compliance” in provinces with weaker grids or opaque data disclosure. Effective regeneration requires not just relative improvements, but clear, enforceable limits that drive absolute decline in ecological pressures.
Finally, people and place matter. More than 1.7 million coal-related jobs are forecast to disappear by the end of this decade, concentrated in provinces like Shanxi. Without robust reskilling programmes, social-safety nets and community-led economic diversification, the transition can deepen regional inequalities—contradicting regeneration’s commitment to social as well as ecological flourishing. A regenerative path would pair climate-sensitive power mandates with proactive investment in coal-belt livelihoods, ensuring that workers and communities become co-authors of the new economy rather than casualties of it.
In short, China’s quotas are a vital lever—but whether they become a regenerative milestone or merely a partial step hinges on how the country tackles hydropower impacts, coal back-ups, absolute limits and just-transition safeguards in the critical years ahead.
The balance sheet
The quotas now on China’s statute books show how quickly an economy can pivot when policy, capital, and technology line up. Yet it also reminds us that regeneration is more than decarbonisation. Real regeneration asks every actor—governments, firms, financiers, and citizens—to press further. If you shape policy, press for absolute emissions caps that protect rivers and workers alongside the climate. If you manage supply chains, reward steel and cement partners that meet tougher, transparent renewable‑energy thresholds. If you invest, channel capital toward solutions that restore ecosystems and strengthen local livelihoods in the same move. And if you simply care about a flourishing future, keep the spotlight on whether today’s headline reforms are healing the whole system—ecological, social, and economic—rather than one piece at a time.
The journey beyond sustainability toward regeneration will be won by those who refuse half‑measures—so let’s keep raising the bar, together.
Chad Frischmann is illuminem Senior Contributor and Regenerative Economy Columnist. illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers.
Sources:
https://www.regenintel.earth
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/china-sets-its-first-renewable-standards-steel-cement-polysilicon-2025-07-11/
https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/specter-of-dams-and-diversion-looms-over-southeast-asias-salween-river/
https://www.world-energy.org/article/50838.html
https://www.carbonbrief.org/china-briefing-10-july-2025-new-sector-targets-overcapacity-dressing-down-adaptation-scorecard/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/09/chinas-coal-heartland-fighting-for-a-greener-future
