Carbon Markets 2.0: a new paradigm
· 9 min read
Imagine a world where every ton of greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted is matched by a ton of GHG reduced or removed — a world where the cost of emitting GHG reflects the true social and environmental impact of climate change, and where the most efficient and effective solutions for mitigating climate change are rewarded and scaled up.
This is the vision of Carbon Markets 2.0, a new paradigm for harnessing the power of carbon pricing to accelerate the transition to a net-zero emissions world. Carbon Markets 2.0 is not just a theoretical concept but a practical and feasible reality that can be achieved by addressing current pain points, scaling up impact, and strengthening the market for climate action.
However, carbon markets are not living up to their potential and credibility. The current supply and demand of carbon credits are not aligned with the level of ambition and urgency required by the Paris Agreement. The quality and integrity of carbon credits vary widely, and there is a lack of clear and robust standards and frameworks to ensure their environmental and social effectiveness. Market transparency and liquidity are also low, and public awareness and acceptance are mixed.
To overcome these challenges and unlock the full potential of carbon markets, we need a new paradigm that we call Carbon Markets 2.0. The concept involves a set of actions and initiatives to address pain points, scale up impact, and strengthen the market for climate action. In this article, we will explore the pain points to be addressed, the main elements of Carbon Markets 2.0, and how they can be implemented by different stakeholders.
These challenges encompass the barriers hindering the development and deployment of carbon projects, which generate carbon credits by reducing or removing GHG emissions. Some of these challenges include:
High costs and risks: Developing and deploying carbon projects can be costly and risky, particularly for technological solutions in the early stages. Costs and risks include upfront capital, operational expenses, technical uncertainties, regulatory complexities, and market uncertainties.
Limited scalability and replicability: Scaling up and replicating carbon projects, especially nature-based ones requiring substantial land, water, and resources, pose challenges. Scalability and replicability depend on factors like site availability, local environmental and social conditions, and institutional arrangements.
Restricted innovation and collaboration: Innovating and collaborating on carbon projects, especially with new solutions lacking established methodologies, technologies, and business models, can be challenging. Enabling innovation and collaboration requires support such as research, knowledge exchange, best practices, and partnerships.
These challenges and barriers hinder the demand and uptake of carbon credits, representing GHG emission reductions or removals achieved by carbon projects. Among these pain points:
Low awareness and understanding: Various sources of demand, including governments, businesses, and consumers, have low awareness and understanding of the role and potential of carbon credits. Myths and misconceptions, such as considering them greenwashing or a substitute for emissions reduction, further complicate matters.
Incomplete information and guidance: Information and guidance on using carbon credits are incomplete and inconsistent, especially regarding accounting, reporting, and claiming emission reductions or removals. Standards and frameworks governing the carbon market, including voluntary carbon standards (VCS), social carbon standards (SCS), and the Paris Agreement's Article 6, suffer from gaps and overlaps.
Low price and demand signals: Carbon credit prices and demand signals are low and volatile, reflecting a lack of clear, long-term policy and market drivers. The current price doesn't reflect the true social cost of carbon or the ambition needed to meet Paris Agreement goals. Limited demand stems from buyer availability and willingness, as well as competition and substitution from other instruments like carbon taxes and offsets.
Structural pain points encompass the challenges and barriers affecting the overall functioning and efficiency of the carbon market, including market design, infrastructure, and governance. Fragmentation and opacity plague the carbon market, involving multiple platforms, intermediaries, and stakeholders in carbon credit supply and demand. These factors lead to transaction costs, information asymmetry, and trust issues, diminishing market efficiency and liquidity. Furthermore, the market lacks a common and reliable registry, verification, and tracking system, undermining the integrity and traceability of carbon credits.
Meanwhile, incentives for participating in the carbon market are insufficient and misaligned, particularly for project developers and host countries. Developers face high upfront costs and risks, uncertain returns, and limited access to finance and technology. Host countries may encounter trade-offs between national commitments and the transfer of emission reductions or removals to other nations.
To improve the capacity of carbon markets and address existing challenges, a comprehensive approach involving multiple stakeholders and strategies is necessary.
Firstly, there is a critical need for clear and consistent guidance on the utilization of carbon credits across various sectors, including governments, businesses, and consumers. This guidance should encompass accounting, reporting, and claiming procedures for emission reductions or removals, while also addressing concerns such as double counting and leakage. Importantly, this guidance must align with the regulations outlined in the Paris Agreement's Article 6, which establishes the framework for international collaboration on mitigation efforts.
Secondly, establishing quality benchmarks for carbon credits is essential to ensure their environmental and social impact aligns with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. These benchmarks should encompass criteria such as additionality, permanence, and co-benefits, and should be enforced through rigorous third-party verification processes.
Furthermore, enhancing market transparency and liquidity is crucial for efficiently matching supply and demand of carbon credits. This can be achieved through the development of a reliable registry and tracking system, as well as the integration of digital platforms to facilitate transactions. Timely dissemination of market data and information is also essential to support informed decision-making.
Lastly, government support and leadership are vital for fostering an enabling environment for carbon projects. This includes setting ambitious emission reduction targets, implementing effective carbon pricing policies, and providing financial and technical assistance to project developers. Additionally, engaging in international cooperation and dialogue on carbon markets is key to driving global progress in emissions reduction efforts.
To implement carbon markets 2.0, different stakeholders have different roles and responsibilities, as well as opportunities and challenges. Here, we highlight some of the key stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities in carbon markets 2.0:
Project developers are the entities that develop and deploy carbon projects, that generate carbon credits by reducing or removing GHG emissions. Their roles and responsibilities in carbon markets 2.0 include developing and deploying high-quality and scalable carbon projects that meet the quality benchmarks and standards for carbon credits, as well as the environmental and social needs and expectations of the host countries and communities. They innovate and collaborate on new and emerging carbon solutions that leverage the latest technologies, methodologies, and business models, as well as the best practices and knowledge from different sectors and regions. Additionally, they access and secure adequate and affordable finance and technology for carbon projects, as well as manage the costs and risks associated with carbon projects.
They provide the demand for and purchase carbon credits, either for compliance or voluntary purposes. Their roles and responsibilities in Carbon Markets 2.0 include demanding and purchasing high-quality and credible carbon credits that match their emission reduction or removal targets and strategies, as well as their environmental and social values and commitments. They account, report, and claim the emission reductions or removals achieved by the carbon credits, as well as avoid double counting, leakage, and reversal, in accordance with the guidance and rules of the carbon market. Moreover, they communicate and engage with their stakeholders, such as shareholders, customers, and regulators, on the role and potential of carbon credits, as well as the benefits and challenges of using carbon credits.
They supply and sell carbon credits, either directly or indirectly. Their roles and responsibilities in Carbon Markets 2.0 include supplying and selling high-quality and credible carbon credits that meet the quality benchmarks and standards for carbon credits, as well as the demand and expectations of the buyers and the market. They verify and certify the emission reductions or removals achieved by the carbon credits, as well as ensure the integrity and traceability of carbon credits, in accordance with the quality benchmarks and standards of the carbon market. Additionally, they price and market the carbon credits, as well as provide data and information on the performance and impact of carbon credits, to attract and retain buyers and investors.
These entities facilitate the exchange and transaction of carbon credits, such as brokers, platforms, and registries. Their roles and responsibilities in Carbon Markets 2.0 include facilitating the discovery, exchange, and settlement of carbon credits, as well as providing market infrastructure and services, such as registry, verification, and tracking, to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of the carbon market. They also enhance the transparency and liquidity of the carbon market, as well as provide data and information on the market trends, prices, and performance of carbon credits, to support the decision-making and risk management of the market participants. Moreover, they innovate and integrate digital solutions and tools, such as blockchain, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things, to improve the quality, security, and scalability of the carbon market.
Ultimately, they set and implement the policies and regulations that govern the carbon market, as well as the national and international commitments that drive the carbon market. Their roles and responsibilities in Carbon Markets 2.0 include setting and implementing ambitious and credible emission reduction or removal targets, as well as effective and consistent carbon pricing policies and regulations, to create a strong and stable policy and market drivers for the carbon market. They provide financial and technical assistance and incentives for the development and deployment of carbon projects, as well as for the demand and uptake of carbon credits, to support the mobilization and allocation of finance for the carbon market. Additionally, they engage in international cooperation and dialogue on carbon markets, as well as align with the rules and modalities of the Paris Agreement's Article 6, to ensure the compatibility and coherence of the carbon market.
Carbon markets are crucial for speeding up the transition to a net-zero emissions world. However, they face multiple pain points, hindering their potential and credibility. To overcome these obstacles and unlock their full potential, we need a new approach: Carbon Markets 2.0. This involves a series of actions to address pain points, amplify impact, and bolster the market for climate action. Such efforts demand collaboration among stakeholders like project developers, buyers, sellers, intermediaries, and governments, each with distinct roles in Carbon Markets 2.0. By implementing this approach, we can harness the power of carbon markets for climate action.
This article draws on insights from the GenZero white paper, offering a comprehensive analysis of Carbon Markets 2.0. I encourage you to explore the paper for more on the concept, rationale, and implementation of Carbon Markets 2.0. Join the conversation and share your thoughts on how we can make Carbon Markets 2.0 a reality.
illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.
Gokul Shekar
Effects · Climate Change
illuminem briefings
Mitigation · Climate Change
illuminem briefings
Climate Change · Environmental Sustainability
Financial Times
Carbon Market · Public Governance
The Guardian
Agriculture · Climate Change
Euronews
Climate Change · Effects