background imageUnsplash

Apple, BP and Orsted: Can we trust corporate sustainability pledges?

author image

By illuminem briefings

· 2 min read


illuminem summarises for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on Euronews or enjoy below:

🗞️ Driving the news: Corporate climate targets face growing scrutiny for lacking credibility, transparency, and feasibility, according to sustainability consultant Chris Hocknell
He warns that many net-zero pledges are undermined by vague definitions, unrealistic roadmaps, and a failure to account for emissions embedded in products, calling for a shift to a more innovation-driven, efficiency-focused approach to sustainability

🔭 The context: Corporate climate pledges have surged since the Paris Agreement, yet widespread criticism has emerged over companies’ reliance on partial disclosures (e.g., Scope 1 and 2 only), offsetting, and long-term targets that current executives will not be accountable for
Major firms like BP have faced backlash for claiming progress while continuing core fossil fuel operations
“Hard-to-abate” industries — steel, cement, chemicals — struggle to decarbonise due to limited technological alternatives

🌍 Why it matters for the planet: Misleading or unachievable corporate pledges risk eroding public trust, delaying action, and creating a false sense of progress toward global climate goals
A clearer, more accountable and innovation-driven pathway — emphasising efficiency improvements and realistic timelines — can help ensure meaningful emissions reductions while maintaining economic resilience and enabling technology deployment at scale

⏭️ What's next: Stakeholders are likely to increase calls for stricter disclosure standards, third-party verification, and regulation to enforce credible climate strategies
Policymakers may also need to balance ambition with enabling innovation and supporting transition in hard-to-abate sectors
Companies that align messaging with measurable, near-term progress — and clearly communicate limitations and trade-offs — will be better positioned to maintain credibility and stakeholder confidence.

💬 One quote: “We need an efficiency philosophy rather than a rationing and a budgetary perspective… and a more entrepreneurial and innovation-minded approach to all of our policymaking,” — Chris Hocknell

📈 One stat: Only 24% of corporate net-zero targets are judged fully aligned with science-based pathways, according to the Net Zero Tracker 2024 assessment

See on illuminem's Data Hub™ the sustainability performance of thousands of companies like BP, Ørsted, TotalEnergies, and Enel

Click for more news covering the latest on corporate governance 

Did you enjoy this illuminem voice? Support us by sharing this article!
author photo

About the author

illuminem's editorial team, providing you with concise summaries of the most important sustainability news of the day. Follow us on Linkedin, Twitter​ & Instagram

Other illuminem Voices


Related Posts


You cannot miss it!

Weekly. Free. Your Top 10 Sustainability & Energy Posts.

You can unsubscribe at any time (read our privacy policy)