· 2 min read
illuminem summarizes for you the essential news of the day. Read the full piece on MIT News or enjoy below:
🗞️ Driving the news: A new report by the American Physical Society, led by MIT physicist Washington Taylor, evaluates the feasibility of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies
• The study finds that while CDR is not a silver bullet, it remains a necessary complement to emissions reductions
• The report highlights the physical and energy constraints of different CDR methods
🔭 The context: CDR differs from carbon capture and storage (CCS) by removing CO₂ already in the atmosphere rather than at emission sources
• The report categorizes CDR into two types: cyclic methods, like direct air capture (DAC), which require high energy input, and once-through methods, like enhanced rock weathering, which demand large material resources
• Both face fundamental physical and economic challenges at the gigaton scale
🌍 Why it matters for the planet: To limit global warming, significant CDR will likely be required alongside deep emissions cuts
• The study underscores the energy and material trade-offs of scaling up CDR
• Understanding these constraints can help policymakers design balanced climate strategies that prioritize cost-effective emissions reductions
⏭️ What's next: The report calls for selective investment in CDR research while focusing primarily on emissions reductions
• Policymakers should integrate CDR into broader economic frameworks that incentivize both emissions cuts and removals
• The findings emphasize the urgency of acting before climate impacts worsen
💬 One quote: "CDR is not a magic bullet, but also not a no-go... If we are serious about managing climate change, we will likely want substantial CDR in addition to aggressive emissions reductions." — Washington Taylor, MIT Professor of Physics
📈 One stat: Capturing 1 gigaton of CO₂ via DAC requires energy comparable to the total yearly electricity consumption of Virginia
Click for more news covering the latest on carbon removal
